August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi - 110 066  &  Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110 067. Phone:26161137 Fax: 26186536 Helpline: 61117666

S.No Name Registration No Text of Request Request Document Request Reply Document
1 Maniram Sharma CICOM/R/2014/00203
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
2 Brijesh Kumar Shukla CICOM/R/2014/00315
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
3 R K Jain CICOM/R/2014/00348/3
Query Reply/information Point A,(B), (E) & (F) These points of your RTI application is being transferred to JS (Admn) for their direct disposal. Point (C) & (D) These points of your RTI application is being transferred to DS (Admn) for their direct disposal.
4 Brijesh Kumar Shukla CICOM/R/2014/00367
this matter is pertains to the ex.registry of IC(LS)
5 Brijesh Kumar Shukla CICOM/R/2014/00368
This matter is pertains to the registry of ex.IC(LS)
6 Brijesh Kumar Shukla CICOM/R/2014/00369
This matter is pertains to the registry of ex.IC(LS)
7 Brijesh Kumar Shukla CICOM/R/2014/00372
It is concerned to to the registry of ex.IC(LS).Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
8 Brijesh Kumar Shukla CICOM/R/2014/00373
It is concerned to to the registry of ex.IC(LS). Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
9 Brijesh Kumar Shukla CICOM/R/2014/00389
This matter is pertains to the registry of ex.IC(LS). Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
10 Brijesh Kumar Shukla CICOM/R/2014/00465
Matter related to ex.IC(LS). Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
11 Baldev Raj Seth CICOM/R/2014/00494
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
12 Brijesh Kumar Shukla CICOM/R/2014/00499
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
13 Saroj Tyagi CICOM/R/2014/00554
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
14 M K Tyagi CICOM/R/2014/00555
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
15 R K Jain CICOM/R/2014/00568
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
16 R K Jain CICOM/R/2014/00592
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
17 T K Roy CICOM/R/2014/00601/1
Point No.1(A) and (B) is concerned to you. Reply to be sent directly to the appellant.
18 Brijesh Kumar Shukla CICOM/R/2014/00604
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
19 R K Jain CICOM/R/2014/00615
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
20 Girish Prasad Gupta CICOM/R/2014/00619
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
21 Brijesh Kumar Shukla CICOM/R/2014/00621
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
22 Brijesh Kumar Shukla CICOM/R/2014/00626
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
23 R K Jain CICOM/R/2014/00629
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
24 Yateendra Singh Jafa CICOM/R/2014/00636
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
25 Yateendra Singh Jafa CICOM/R/2014/00637
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
26 Brijesh Kumar Shukla CICOM/R/2014/00646
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
27 Brijesh Kumar Shukla CICOM/R/2014/00647
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
28 R K Jain CICOM/R/2014/00662/1
Please see Annexure-F of the RTI and send your reply on the points concerned to you directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
29 R K Jain CICOM/R/2014/00666
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
30 R K Jain CICOM/R/2014/00678/1
Please see Annexure-G of the RTI and send your reply on the points concerned to you directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
31 Alok Varshney CICOM/R/2014/00693
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
32 Vinod Kumar Gond CICOM/R/2014/00704
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
33 Sharad S Phadke CICOM/R/2014/00715/3
Point no.1&2 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
34 R R Kuppusamy CICOM/R/2014/00716
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
35 Lokesh Batra CICOM/R/2014/00757
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
36 Kamlesh Kashyap CICOM/R/2014/00775
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
37 Kamlesh Kashyap CICOM/R/2014/00801
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
38 Ashwani Arora CICOM/R/2014/00806
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
39 B K Dadlani CICOM/R/2014/00832/1
Point No.1,2,3,4,5 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
40 Lokesh K Batra CICOM/R/2014/00840
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
a) Information regarding number of cases pending as on 1-9-14 and as on 30-11-2014 is available on CIC website in Pending Cases Report. b) Inspection of files can be done on any working day between 3.30 to 6.00 PM with prior intimation.
41 B K Dadlani CICOM/R/2014/00847
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
42 H C Makkar CICOM/R/2014/00850
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
43 Kartik Chandra CICOM/R/2014/00852
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
44 Mukesh Jain CICOM/R/2014/00855/1
Point No.1&2 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
45 Rajinder K Singla CICOM/R/2014/00865
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
46 Bahadur Singh CICOM/R/2014/00868
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
47 Dr Rajinder K Singla CICOM/R/2014/00897
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
1 &2.It is requested to see Annual Reports on CIC website at http://cic.gov.in/index.html in Annual Report section. Annual Report up to 2012-13 are available on website. 3.Suo Moto disclosure under section 4(1)b for Central Information Commission is available on CIC website at RTI disclosure.
48 Sandeep Kumar CICOM/R/2014/00920
It is concerned to you
49 Siba Sankar Patro CICOM/R/2014/00949
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
50 ASHA VERMA CICOM/R/2014/60384
PDF DOCUMENT ATTACHED
In the RTI application you want to know the status of your 2nd appeal sent to this commission and reasons of long time taken in disposal of 2nd appeals filed in the commission. The information is as under: The 2nd appeal filed against SBI, registered as CIC/MP/A/2014/000561 is pending in the registry of IC(MP) (tel: 011-26105027)and has been listed for hearing on 15.1.2015. Notice of hearing will be issued after getting confirmation of availability of vc studio. Regarding delay/long time taken for disposal of 2nd appeals in the commission it is to be mentioned that the commission is getting a large no. of 2nd appeals from all over the country involving various public authorities and the cases are disposed as per their seniority. Due to the pendency, it is not possible to dispose the cases in a short period of time.
51 Akshay Kumar Malhotra CICOM/R/2014/60388/1
Pl go through the RTI application and send reply on the point/file concerning your registry as mentioned in the RTI application
52 S.S. CHAWLA CICOM/R/2014/60403
The applicant had filed a non-compliance complaint on 20/01/2014 which was diarised vide no. 104619. The applicant had also sought the action/decision taken by the Commission on stated complaint but the CPIO endorsed that no action taken by the Commission. Due to non disposal of the non compliance complaint the public authority (ies) is constantly disregarding the decision of the Commission. In this regard the CPIO concern please furnish the following information under the provision of the RTI Act,2005: (1) The action/decision taken by the Commission on stated non compliance complaint as on date. (2) The copy of relevant policy matter of the Commission wherein Commission endorse the non compliance complaints as per their policy. (3) Numbers of non compliance complaints received by the Commission from the last five years. (4) Action/decision taken by the Commission on non compliance complaints from the last five years.
Not Available
53 ROHIT KUMAR CICOM/R/2014/60416/1
To, The Central Public Information Officer, Central Information Commission, New Delhi 110002. Dated: 17th of December 2014. Sub:- Request for information under R.T.I Act 2005 . Dear Sir/Madam, I would like to exercise my legal right to obtain Information which is guaranteed to every citizen of this Country through Right to Information Act 2005 by requesting you to provide me the below sought Information in a point wise manner within the stipulated time period :- 1.)Please provide Information regarding the total amount of fine imposed by Central Information Commission on various Public Authorities till date from the very first day when Central Information Commission was constituted. 2.)Please provide information with respect to the total number of appeals received by the Central Information Commission till date from the very first day when Central Information Commission was constituted. 3.)Please provide Information about the number of complaints received by the Central Information Commission under section 18 of the Right to Information Act and the number of cases in which enquiry was initiated by the Commission on such complaints, till date, from the very first day when Central Information Commission was Constituted. 4.)Please provide information regarding the number of cases in which the disciplinary action has been recommended under section 20 of the Right to Information Act 2005, by the Central Information Commission, till date, from the very first day when Central Information Commission was constituted. With regards Rohit Kumar, Room No. - 2B-98, Law Boys Hostel, (Kings Campus - 11), School of Law, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, (Odisha) -751024, Mob :-(08093324260 / 8579808384), Email: rohitsingh3280@gmail.com
Not Available
a) & b) No of appeal and complaints registered and disposed off from 2006-07 onwards Year Registered Disposed 2006-07 6839 4074 2007-08 11621 7722 2008 -09 15426 13322 2009-10 22800 19482 2010-11 28875 24071 2011-12 33922 23112 2012-13 28801 24550
54 Medha Rani CICOM/R/2014/60436
On 13.10.2014, My husband (Shri B.K. Thakur) had sent a detailed presentation/complaint to Shri M. Sridhar Acharyulu, Information Commissioner, Central Information Commission, August Kranti Bhavan Bhikaji Kama Palace, New Delhi-110066, which has already been delivered by the Indian Postal Department to the CIC on 15.10.2014 Subject of my presentation is as under: Regarding wrong order passed by CIC vides its order number CIC/DS/A/2013/002546-SA dated 12.09.2014, which is based on false/fake statement made by the concerned CPIO during the hearing on 05.09.2014 -Presidents Secretariat had also forwarded his above mentioned complaint to the CIC along with public grievance registration number PRSEC/E/2014/14243 with following direction:- Action taken on the petition may please be communicated to the petitioner directly under intimation to this Secretariat. My husband had also stated in his written submission dated 15.12.2004 submitted by him to the CIC in connection with hearing of complaint related to the file number CIC/DS/C/2013/000517-SA and CIC/DS/C/2013/000546-SA which was held on 17.12.2014 that his complaint dated 13.10.2014 is still pending in the CIC in the file number CIC/DS/A/2013/002546-SA of the CIC. Kindly inform me about action taken by the CIC on his above mentioned complaint under RTI Act, 2005: 1.Inform me that either the CIC has taken any decision on the complaint dated 13.10.2014 of my husband (Shri Bishnu Kant Thakur) related to the file number CIC/DS/C/2013/000546-SA of the CIC or NOT 2.An attested copy of order passed by the CIC on the complaint dated 13.10.2014 of my husband (Shri Bishnu Kant Thakur) related to the file number CIC/DS/C/2013/000546-SA of the CIC, be provided. 3.An attested copy of reply sent by the CIC to the Presidents Secretariat in response of public grievance registration number PRSEC/E/2014/14243, be provided. ( I want to make it clear here that I do not want to get reply of the CIC in response of the letter number P1/A/2409140133 dated 24.09.2014 of the Presidents Secretariat, I want to get an attested copy of reply sent by the CIC to the Presidents Secretariat in response of public grievance registration number PRSEC/E/2014/14243) 4.Inform me that either the CIC has considered the fact in its order related to the file number CIC/DS/C/2013/000517-SA and CIC/DS/C/2013/000546-SA of the CIC, as submitted by my husband (Shri Bishnu Kant Thakur) in his written submission dated 15.12.2004 in connection with the hearing of complaint related to the file number CIC/DS/C/2013/000517-SA and CIC/DS/C/2013/000546-SA of the CIC, which was held on 17.12.2014 OR the CIC has once again passed the order by ignoring the facts as submitted by my husband (Shri Bishnu Kant Thakur) to the CIC. 5.An attested copy of reply sent by the CIC to my husband (Shri Bishnu Kant Thakur) in response of his online RTI application registration number CICOM/R/2014/60308 and CICOM/R/2014/60309, be provide
Not Available
send through speed post
55 Bodh Krishna Thakur CICOM/R/2014/60438
On 13.10.2014, My son (Shri Bishnu Kant Thakur) had sent a detailed presentation/complaint to Shri M. Sridhar Acharyulu, Information Commissioner, CIC, August Kranti Bhavan Bhikaji Kama Palace, New Delhi-110066, which has already been delivered by the Indian Postal Department to the CIC on 15.10.2014 Subject of his presentation is as under: Regarding wrong order passed by CIC vides its order number CIC/DS/A/2013/002546-SA dated 12.09.2014, which is based on false/fake statement made by the concerned CPIO during the hearing on 05.09.2014 Presidents Secretariat had also forwarded his above mentioned complaint to the CIC along with public grievance registration number PRSEC/E/2014/14243 with following direction:- Action taken on the petition may please be communicated to the petitioner directly under intimation to this Secretariat. My son had also stated in his written submission dated 15.12.2004 submitted by him to the CIC in connection with hearing of complaint related to the file number CIC/DS/C/2013/000517-SA and CIC/DS/C/2013/000546-SA which was held on 17.12.2014 that his complaint dated 13.10.2014 is still pending in the CIC in the file number CIC/DS/A/2013/002546-SA of the CIC. Kindly inform me about action taken by the CIC on his above mentioned complaint under RTI Act, 2005: 1.Inform me that either the CIC has taken any decision on the complaint dated 13.10.2014 of my son (Shri Bishnu Kant Thakur) related to the file number CIC/DS/A/2013/0002546-SA of the CIC or NOT 2.An attested copy of order passed by the CIC on the complaint dated 13.10.2014 of my son (Shri Bishnu Kant Thakur) related to the file number CIC/DS/A/2013/0002546-SA of the CIC, be provided. 3.An attested copy of reply sent by the CIC to the Presidents Secretariat in response of public grievance registration number PRSEC/E/2014/14243, be provided. (I want to make it clear here that I do not want to get reply of the CIC in response of the letter number P1/A/2409140133 dated 24.09.2014 of the Presidents Secretariat, I want to get an attested copy of reply sent by the CIC to the Presidents Secretariat in response of public grievance registration number PRSEC/E/2014/14243) 4.Inform me that either the CIC has considered the fact in its order related to the file number CIC/DS/C/2013/000517-SA and CIC/DS/C/2013/000546-SA of the CIC, as submitted by my son (Shri Bishnu Kant Thakur) in his written submission dated 15.12.2004 in connection with the hearing of complaint related to the file number CIC/DS/C/2013/000517-SA and CIC/DS/C/2013/000546-SA of the CIC, which was held on 17.12.2014 OR the CIC has once again passed the order by ignoring the facts as submitted by my son (Shri Bishnu Kant Thakur) to the CIC. 5.An attested copy of reply sent by the CIC to my son (Shri Bishnu Kant Thakur) in response of his online RTI application registration number CICOM/R/2014/60308 and CICOM/R/2014/60309, be provide
Not Available
send through speed post
56 Savita Agrawal CICOM/R/2014/80021
Sir, Section 4(1)(b) of the RTI Act - Suo Motu Disclosure As per section Section 4(1)(b) of the RTI Act requires every public authority to publish the rules, regulations, instructions, manuals and records, held by it or under its control or used by its employees for discharging its functions. Reserve ank of India has published Staff Service Rules on its wesite whereas State Bank of India in a reply has stated that the Service Rules of SBI officers does not come under the ambit of Section 4(1)(b) of the RTI Act. Please arrange to provide me the copy of prevalent instructions /directions by CIC in the matter. Thanks
Not Available
57 Avinash Kumar Singh CICOM/R/2015/00006
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
58 Rajesh Kumar CICOM/R/2015/00037/1
Point No.2 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
send through speed post
59 Prem Chand Verma CICOM/R/2015/00039
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
senf through speed post
60 Kapil Dev Aggarwal CICOM/R/2015/00060
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
61 Dharampal Singh CICOM/R/2015/00066
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
62 Kunal CICOM/R/2015/00068/1
Point no. 20, 21 are concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
20.The number of cases in the CIC where DOPT is a party Total 207 cases are pending as on 22-01-15 againt DoPT. 21. The steps taken by CIC to ensure that the Government organisations put up the statutory information on their website. Yes, CIC is monitoring the suo motu disclosure under section 4(1)b by public authorities on their website.
63 Sajjan Kumar CICOM/R/2015/00077/2
Point no. 2 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
64 B L Sud CICOM/R/2015/00079
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
65 A K Omray CICOM/R/2015/00115/1
Item 2 & 3 are concerned to you as the then DR to erstwhile Registry of Ex.CIC(SM)- F.No. CIC/SM/C/2012/000880. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.Hard copy of application already sent to you vide letter dated 30.01.2015.
66 Harihar Sharma CICOM/R/2015/00122/3
Point no.3,4&5 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
67 Banwari Lal Tanwar CICOM/R/2015/00128
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
68 Mrinal Kanti Rakshit CICOM/R/2015/00149
it is concerned to DO IC (SH)
69 Manish Aggarwal CICOM/R/2015/00150
RTI Concerned to DO IC(KY)
70 Usha Devi CICOM/R/2015/00168
it is concerned to Gramin Bank DO IC(SH)
71 R.K. Jain CICOM/R/2015/00170
It is Concerned to DO Ex CIC(RM)
72 P. Sugunawati CICOM/R/2015/00172
its concerned to IC(SH)
73 P. Sugunavati CICOM/R/2015/00173
it is Concerned to IC(SH)
74 Dheeraj Pratap Sirohi CICOM/R/2015/00190
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
75 R K Jain CICOM/R/2015/00198
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
76 Subhas Chatterjee CICOM/R/2015/00200
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
77 R L Goyal CICOM/R/2015/00202
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
78 R K Grover CICOM/R/2015/00208
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
79 S P Goyal CICOM/R/2015/00212
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
80 S P Goyal CICOM/R/2015/00230
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
81 K G Tiwari CICOM/R/2015/00261
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
82 Mrinal Kanti Rakshit CICOM/R/2015/00290
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
83 Aseem Takyar CICOM/R/2015/00303
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
84 Dr Terence Nazareth CICOM/R/2015/00321/2
Point no. 2, 3 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
85 Chandrashekhar Datta CICOM/R/2015/00354/3
point no. a is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
86 A P Singh CICOM/R/2015/00373/1
Point No. 17-18 It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
87 Ananta Devadarshi CICOM/R/2015/00379
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
88 Brahmadeb Bandyopadhyay CICOM/R/2015/00381
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
89 R Maheshwar CICOM/R/2015/00383
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
90 R K Khola CICOM/R/2015/00387
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
91 Jagdish V Gursahani CICOM/R/2015/00390/1
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
92 Anita Upadhyay CICOM/R/2015/00392
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
93 Ajay Kumar Chaudhary CICOM/R/2015/00393
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
94 Chandan Singh Adhikari CICOM/R/2015/00400
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
95 Rajeev Sharma CICOM/R/2015/00405
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
96 R L Goyal CICOM/R/2015/00413
this RTI Concerned to DR To IC(SH)
97 Dinesh Kumar CICOM/R/2015/00428
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
98 T S Sivakumar CICOM/R/2015/00432/1
Point no. 2 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
99 N C Gupta CICOM/R/2015/00433/2
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
100 S P Goyal CICOM/R/2015/00449
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
101 Girish Prasad Gupta CICOM/R/2015/00451
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
102 Devesh Bhatt CICOM/R/2015/00472
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
103 Suresh Prasad Nishad CICOM/R/2015/00478
The undersigned has already relinquished the charge of CPIO to IC VS w e f 11-06-2015. Hence the RTI is being transferred to you. Delay, if any, is regretted.
104 Bramha Dev Yadav CICOM/R/2015/00482
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
105 Prasanta Basu Ray CICOM/R/2015/00489/3
The undersigned has already relinquished the charge of CPIO to IC VS w e f 11-06-2015. Hence the RTI is being transferred to you. Delay, if any, is regretted.
106 Prashant Kumar Kar CICOM/R/2015/00493
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
107 Ashok Kumar Mouriya CICOM/R/2015/00495
The undersigned has already relinquished the charge of CPIO to IC VS w e f 11-06-2015. Hence the RTI is being transferred to you. Delay, if any, is regretted.
108 C S Arora CICOM/R/2015/00514/2
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
109 Arinjay Jain CICOM/R/2015/00520
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
110 Sandeep Kumar CICOM/R/2015/00532
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
111 Ayush Gupta CICOM/R/2015/00534
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
112 Waseem Ameen Mohammad CICOM/R/2015/00541
The undersigned has already relinquished the charge of CPIO to IC VS w e f 11-06-2015. Hence the RTI is being transferred to you. Delay, if any, is regretted.
113 Ravi Prakash Shukla CICOM/R/2015/00544/2
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
114 Lakshmi Bargavi Sriram CICOM/R/2015/00548
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
115 Gopal Krishan CICOM/R/2015/00553
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
116 G G Kamble CICOM/R/2015/00556
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
117 Raj Kumar Mishra CICOM/R/2015/00577
The undersigned has already relinquished the charge of CPIO to IC VS w e f 11-06-2015. Hence the RTI is being transferred to you. Delay, if any, is regretted.
118 Bhushan Sharma CICOM/R/2015/00585
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
119 R L Goyal CICOM/R/2015/00588
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
120 Girish Prasad Gupta CICOM/R/2015/00596
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
121 Ujjal Kumar Datta CICOM/R/2015/00608
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
122 Chaitram Devideen Tele CICOM/R/2015/00609
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
123 Yogesh Sharma CICOM/R/2015/00611
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
124 Uma CICOM/R/2015/00614
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
125 Hari Om CICOM/R/2015/00615
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
126 Daryav Singh Vishwakarma CICOM/R/2015/00619
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
127 Agnibesh Roy CICOM/R/2015/00621
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
128 Vedpal CICOM/R/2015/00623
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
129 Dr. Deepak Juneja CICOM/R/2015/00625/2
Points no.1&2 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
130 Kashi Prasad Jajodia CICOM/R/2015/00632
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
131 Jai Dhara Singh CICOM/R/2015/00638
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
132 R K Mahajan CICOM/R/2015/00640
Advance fees of Rs.10 has been received to furnished the information. It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
133 Prem Nath Relan CICOM/R/2015/00644
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
134 Girish Prasad Gupta CICOM/R/2015/00646
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
135 M Danasegar CICOM/R/2015/00650
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
136 Ajay Kumar Gupta CICOM/R/2015/00654
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
137 Prasanta Basu Ray CICOM/R/2015/00660
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
138 S Manoharan CICOM/R/2015/00661
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
139 V B Mahajan CICOM/R/2015/00664
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
140 Seema Lal CICOM/R/2015/00665
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
141 Kapil Vinayak CICOM/R/2015/00668
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
142 Panna Lal Mukherjee CICOM/R/2015/00669
Advance fees of Rs.40 has been received to furnished the information. It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
143 Damodar V Prabhu CICOM/R/2015/00672
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
144 Dr M C Sharma CICOM/R/2015/00673
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
145 Rajesh Bhardwaj CICOM/R/2015/00677/3
Point no. 1,2,5,9 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
146 Ashok Kumar Malhotra CICOM/R/2015/00678
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
147 Ashok Kumar Shukla CICOM/R/2015/00679
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
148 Surendra Kumar Jain CICOM/R/2015/00685
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
149 Meena Devi CICOM/R/2015/00686
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
150 Anup Kumar Rai CICOM/R/2015/00690
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
151 Mukesh Jain CICOM/R/2015/00693
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
152 Jagdish Prasad Sah CICOM/R/2015/00695/1
Point no B is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
153 T C Bandyopadhyay CICOM/R/2015/00698/1
Point no1,2, 5(a),5(b) is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
154 Pyare Lal CICOM/R/2015/00700
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
155 R H Bansal CICOM/R/2015/00701/2
point no.1,3,4,5,6 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
156 Narendra Prasad CICOM/R/2015/00703/1
Point no.2 (a),(b) is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
157 Narendra Prasad CICOM/R/2015/00703/3
Point no.1(a),(b) is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
158 Vedpal CICOM/R/2015/00704
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
159 G S Gupta CICOM/R/2015/00705/1
pt. 2 of the RTI application concerned to you as the subject matter is of Syndicate Bank.
160 Prasanta Basu Ray CICOM/R/2015/00708/1
Point no. 1 to 6 are concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
161 Subodh Kumar Wadhwa CICOM/R/2015/00711/7
Point no. 4b, 4c, 8 & 12 are concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
162 Subodh Kumar Wadhwa CICOM/R/2015/00711/8
Point no. 4b, 4c, 8 & 12 are concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
163 Rajiv Bhardwaj CICOM/R/2015/00712
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
164 N A Shah Ansari CICOM/R/2015/00716
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
165 R L Goyal CICOM/R/2015/00718
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
166 Puneeth T CICOM/R/2015/00720
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
167 Geeta CICOM/R/2015/00722
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
168 Shanti Prasad Bhatt CICOM/R/2015/00724
Extra fees of Rs.20 has been received to furnished the information. It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
169 Suresh Kumar Gupta CICOM/R/2015/00729
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
170 Jai Mehra CICOM/R/2015/00734
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
171 Ved Pal CICOM/R/2015/00738/1
Point no.1 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
172 Dr D S Singh CICOM/R/2015/00739
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
173 A R Shah CICOM/R/2015/00745
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
please see the attached file.
174 Ram Narayan CICOM/R/2015/00748
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
175 Baburam Ravi CICOM/R/2015/00750
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
176 Saurabh Ranjan CICOM/R/2015/00757
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
177 Gurdarshan Singh CICOM/R/2015/00759
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
178 K K Garg CICOM/R/2015/00763
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
179 Raj Kumar Sharma CICOM/R/2015/00769
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
180 Ajay Kumar Chaudhary CICOM/R/2015/00770/3
Point no.5 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
181 Navdeep Gupta CICOM/R/2015/00773
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
182 Navdeep Gupta CICOM/R/2015/00773/1
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
183 Rafik Dawud Kara Memoh CICOM/R/2015/00777
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
184 S C Garg CICOM/R/2015/00778/1
Point no.2 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
185 S C Garg CICOM/R/2015/00778/2
Point no.1&3 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
186 Dr Satya Vijay Singh CICOM/R/2015/00780/1
Point no.1 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
187 Shyam Kumar CICOM/R/2015/00783
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
188 Ashok Kumar CICOM/R/2015/00785
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
189 Dharambir Singh CICOM/R/2015/00786
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
190 Daya Shankar Shukl CICOM/R/2015/00787
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
191 S C Garg CICOM/R/2015/00790/2
Point no.2 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
192 S C Garg CICOM/R/2015/00793/1
Point no.3 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
193 S C Garg CICOM/R/2015/00793/2
Point no.1(i),(ii),(iii) and Point no.2 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
194 Asha CICOM/R/2015/00795
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
195 Ammanullah CICOM/R/2015/00796
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
196 Gagan Bihari Jena CICOM/R/2015/00798
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
197 Vedpal CICOM/R/2015/00801
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
198 Yateendra Singh Jafa CICOM/R/2015/00808
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
199 Bimal Shankar Vishwakarma CICOM/R/2015/00810
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
200 H Hanume Gowda CICOM/R/2015/00811/1
All Points is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
201 K K Kaushik CICOM/R/2015/00816
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
202 R L Goyal CICOM/R/2015/00819
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
203 Anita T Jagaria CICOM/R/2015/00820
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
204 Nitin Kumar Mittal CICOM/R/2015/00823
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
205 N Saini CICOM/R/2015/00824/4
point no.1 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
206 R P Gupta CICOM/R/2015/00826/2
Point no.5 to 8 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
207 Ranjana Dwivedi CICOM/R/2015/00827
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
208 Vinoth Ranganathan CICOM/R/2015/00838/1
Points no.3(1)to(7) is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
209 Nawab Baig CICOM/R/2015/00839
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
210 Yateendra Singh Jafa CICOM/R/2015/00841
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
211 B K Gupta CICOM/R/2015/00843
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
212 Akhilesh Kumar Nigam CICOM/R/2015/00846
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
213 Rajiv Arya CICOM/R/2015/00847
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
214 Sounder Raj CICOM/R/2015/00848
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
215 Rakesh Kumar Gupta CICOM/R/2015/00849
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
216 V S Nathan CICOM/R/2015/00850
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
217 Manoj Kumar Goyal CICOM/R/2015/00869
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
218 Hirak Bhattacharyya CICOM/R/2015/00871
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
219 J V Gopal CICOM/R/2015/00872
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
220 Sandeep Pahal CICOM/R/2015/00878
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
221 Anita T CICOM/R/2015/00880
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
222 Anita Jagasia CICOM/R/2015/00881
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
223 S S Vohra CICOM/R/2015/00885
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
224 Prem Raj CICOM/R/2015/00886/2
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
225 K S Jain CICOM/R/2015/00894
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
226 Shiv Om Prakash CICOM/R/2015/00895
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
227 Prem Raj CICOM/R/2015/00896/1
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
228 Ujjal Kumar Datta CICOM/R/2015/00902
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
229 Jai Mehra CICOM/R/2015/00918
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
230 A R Shah CICOM/R/2015/00919
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
231 Aditya Kumar Dwivedi CICOM/R/2015/00920
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
232 Dr Mohan Lal CICOM/R/2015/00925
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
233 Sanjay K Dalal CICOM/R/2015/00926
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
234 A M Attar CICOM/R/2015/00929
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
235 Archana Pandey CICOM/R/2015/00932/1
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
236 Nemi Chand Jain CICOM/R/2015/00933
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
237 R S Sagar CICOM/R/2015/00936
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
238 Dinesh Chopra CICOM/R/2015/00937
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
239 Santosh Kumar Verma CICOM/R/2015/00948
Further fees of has been received to furnished the information. It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
240 Dr B Kalaivannan CICOM/R/2015/00949
Further fees of Rs.160 has been received to furnished the information. It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
241 Girish Prasad Gupta CICOM/R/2015/00953
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
242 Gopal Kansara CICOM/R/2015/00956/1
Points no.4,5 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
243 Gopal Kansara CICOM/R/2015/00956/2
Point no.3 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
244 Gopal Kansara CICOM/R/2015/00956/4
Point no.2 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
245 Atul Chandra Gupta CICOM/R/2015/00960
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
246 P S Agrawal CICOM/R/2015/00961
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
247 Mohan Lal Sharma CICOM/R/2015/00966
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
248 Manoj Kumar Goyal CICOM/R/2015/00968/3
Points no.I,VIII is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
249 Santosh Kumar Shrivastava CICOM/R/2015/00970
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
250 Y Nabi CICOM/R/2015/00973/1
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
251 Ravinder Saini CICOM/R/2015/00983
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
252 Ravi Venkatraman CICOM/R/2015/00986
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
253 Ravindra B Bhagwat CICOM/R/2015/00990
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
254 Pooja CICOM/R/2015/00993
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
255 Pramod Kumar Singh CICOM/R/2015/00998
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
256 Mohammed Rafi CICOM/R/2015/00999/2
Point no.1 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
257 Mahesh Chandra Pandey CICOM/R/2015/01000
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
258 A R Shah CICOM/R/2015/01002
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
259 Manish Jain CICOM/R/2015/01005
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
260 K S Jain CICOM/R/2015/01006
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
261 Dr M Haroon Siddiqui CICOM/R/2015/01007
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
262 Meena Srivastava CICOM/R/2015/01010
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
263 B K Goel CICOM/R/2015/01011
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
264 K S Jain CICOM/R/2015/01014/1
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
265 Partha Mandal CICOM/R/2015/01020/3
Points no.2A,2B is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
266 Rakesh Jha CICOM/R/2015/01023
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
267 Hemraj Thakur CICOM/R/2015/01040/2
Points no 4,5,6 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
268 Narinder Singh CICOM/R/2015/01064/2
point no.1 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
269 Ravi Govind Ahuja CICOM/R/2015/01070/2
point no.1 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
270 Rajeev Sharma CICOM/R/2015/01071
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
271 Radheshyam Gupt CICOM/R/2015/01076/1
Point no.1&3 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
272 R L Goyal CICOM/R/2015/01080
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
273 Arun Kumar Vidyarthi CICOM/R/2015/01087
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
274 Deepchandra Sharma CICOM/R/2015/01088
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
275 Mohd Shajid CICOM/R/2015/01092
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
276 Subhash Chandra Agrawal CICOM/R/2015/01099/2
point no.9,10 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
277 Subhash Chandra Agrawal CICOM/R/2015/01099/5
point no.7,8,9,10,11 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
278 Rakesh Jha CICOM/R/2015/01101
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
279 Reena Devi CICOM/R/2015/01103
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
280 R Rajavel CICOM/R/2015/01107
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
281 Prakashchand Chhaganmalji Jain CICOM/R/2015/01108
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
282 Ramamurthy V S CICOM/R/2015/01117
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
283 Daroga Pasi CICOM/R/2015/01123
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
284 Anju Jatwa CICOM/R/2015/01124
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
285 Sanjay Kumar Shukla CICOM/R/2015/01126/1
point no.1 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
286 Dr S K Maheshwari CICOM/R/2015/01131/3
point no.3 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
287 Madan Mohan Podder CICOM/R/2015/01140
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
288 Subhash Chandra Jayaswal CICOM/R/2015/01142/1
points no.3,4,6 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
289 Shankarbhanu Singh CICOM/R/2015/01143
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
290 Naru Eswara Rao CICOM/R/2015/01154
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
291 Jagbir Singh CICOM/R/2015/01161
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
292 R N Tripathi CICOM/R/2015/01162
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
293 Bipad Taran Das CICOM/R/2015/01175
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
294 A B Bhattacharjee CICOM/R/2015/01197
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
295 R P Verma CICOM/R/2015/01201
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
296 Sandesh Kumar CICOM/R/2015/01202
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
297 Ram Swaroop Jangid CICOM/R/2015/01203
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
298 Daya Shankar Shukla CICOM/R/2015/01204
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
299 Jagbir Singh Malik CICOM/R/2015/01205
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
300 Aseem Takyar CICOM/R/2015/01212
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
301 Ramesh Mishra CICOM/R/2015/01223
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
302 Nikhil Bhaskaran CICOM/R/2015/01232
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
303 Amit Kumar CICOM/R/2015/01235
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
304 Sanjiv Chaturvedi CICOM/R/2015/01237
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
305 MANIRAM SHARMA CICOM/R/2015/60053
As per attachment
306 SARASWATHY CICOM/R/2015/60056
(1) Kindly provide me the information whether the penalty of Rs.8750/- imposed by Mr. Wajahat Habibullah, Honourable CIC in his order dated 18/06/2008 (Adjunct to Complaint No.CIC/WB/C/2007/00243 dated 25.4.2007) on Mr.Suresh Chandra, Deputy Director (Admn.), CPIO, O/O Director General of Works, Central Public Works Department was recovered from his salary/remitted to Pay & Accounts Officer, Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi. Please give me certified copies of relevant papers as proof for such recovery/remittance. (2) Please provide me the details & outcome of the enquiry conducted by DG(W), CPWD vide Para-8 of the above CIC order (vide Sl.No.1 above). Please provide me certified copies of all relevant papers, file notings, correspondence etc. Kindly provide me the details of follow up action taken by CIC based on that enquiry report thus submitted. Please provide me certified copies of relevant papers, file notings, correspondence made etc., (3) Kindly provide me the details of Penalty imposed/strictures passed/disciplinary proceedings recommended against the above said Mr.Suresh Chandra, Deputy Director (Administration), CPWD by Central Information Commission from the date of implementation of RTI Act to 14/08/2014. Please provide me all relevant papers, file notings, correspondence made etc., in this regard.
Not Available
307 PANKAJ BHATNAGR CICOM/R/2015/60096
under RTI act 2005 i want to inspect the following files and also want to take the photo copies of each and every documents of these files. 1. CIC/AD/C/203/000596 DATED 7.3.2013 2. CIC/VS/C/2012/000066 DATED 27.6.2012
Not Available
308 PANKAJ BHATNAGR CICOM/R/2015/60100
I HAVE FILED SECOND APPEAL IN THE CASE NO. CIC/VS/C/2012/000066 ON 18.6.2014 WHICH WAS DIARIZED IN YOUR OFFICE VIDE NO. 145909 DATED 23.6.2014. I WANT TO KNOW THAT WHAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN ON SECOND APPEAL FILED BY ME. I WANT TO KNOW WHEN THE FINAL DECISION WILL BE TAKEN ON THE PETITION.
Not Available
309 Anil Agrawal CICOM/R/2015/60111
03/03/2015 Shri Shanti Priye Beck, Joint Secretary &Additional Registrar and CPIO Central Information Commission, New Delhi. SUB: Request for information under RTI ACT, 2005 Sir, I have received your letter No.CIC/SS/C/2013/000643/SH dated 24.02.2015, which says that Mahanagar Gas Ltd. is not covered under the definition of Public Authority as mentioned under section 2(h) of the RTI Act. 2. To recapitulate the sequence of events, following decision was announced by a full bench of CIC consisting of Prof. M.M. Ansari, Information Commissioner, Shri A.N. Tiwari, Information Commissioner, and Shri Wajahat Habibullah, Chief Information Commissioner vide order bearing No.2966/ IC(A)/2008 / F. No. IC/MA / C/ 2008/ 00047 dated August 1, 2008. QUOTE 19. In view of the shareholding pattern of MGL and in view of the control that is apparently exercised by the Government and the nature of the functions performed by them, it leaves no room for doubt that it is and be declared as a Public Authority within the meaning of Section 2(h) of the RTI Act. The Commission accordingly holds MGL to be a Public Authority under the RTI Act and directs that it should discharge its duties as Public Authority as mandated under the RTI Act within one month from the date of receipt of this order. The issue is decided accordingly. UNQUOTE Kindly let me know which Information Commissioner (s) have over ruled the full bench decision of the Commission quoted above. Kindly supply me a copy of the signed decision of the Commission on my appeal and the circumstances leading to the change in decision. My understanding of law is that a decision taken by a three member Bench can be over ruled by a larger bench only. Kindly let me know the circumstances leading to the constitution of the larger bench, if any, that took the decision contained in your letter under reference. Anil Agrawal D-403 Veena Nagar, Opp: SBI, S.V. Road, Malad West, Mumbai-400064.
Not Available
310 Dr Sandeep Kumar Gupta CICOM/R/2015/60112
PLEASE SUPPLY THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE COMPLETE FILE IN CIC/KY/A/2014/000417 IN WHICH DECISION WAS GIVEN ON 2.12.2014
Not Available
311 Mitesh Jha CICOM/R/2015/60151/1
Honourable Sir, Please find attached RTI application. Sincerely, Mitesh Jha
So far as Central Registry is concerned, and as per Commission Receipt Data Base, the item wise reply are as under :- 1. No such e-mails have been received in this Registry. 2. No signed copies of the petitions have been received in this registry.
312 SHIB KUMAR GUPTA CICOM/R/2015/60153
I, requested Shri M.A. Khan Yusufi, Honble Information Commissioner vide my request dated 21.4.2014, to kindly fix an early hearing in my complaint under Section 18 of the RTI Act, 2005 as I am a disabled senior citizen of the age of 75 years. I also enclosed copy of my Disability Certificate with my request dated 21.4.2014. My application dated 21.4.2014 for early hearing is registered in CIC vide diary No. 128887/CR dated 21.4.2014. But, till date no date has been fixed for hearing in my case. I, therefore, request you to kindly apprise me of the action taken on my application dated 21.4.2014 under reference and kindly fix an early hearing in my case and oblige.
Not Available
313 ASHUTOSH GAUTAM CICOM/R/2015/60187
1. PLEASE PROVIDE THE CERTIFIED COPY OF ACTION TAKEN BY THE CIC ON THE APPLICATION DATED 19.01.2015 (ATTACHED HEREWITH AS SUPPORTING DOCUMENT). 2. IF NO ACTION HAS YET BEEN TAKEN ON ABOVE REFERRED APPLICATION DATED 19.01.2015, THEN PLESE PROVIDE THE CERTIFIED COPY OF REASON, IF ANY, FOR NOT TAKING ACTION ON THIS APPLICATION. 3. IF NO ACTION HAS YET BEEN TAKEN ON ABOVE REFERRED APPLICATION DATED 19.01.2015, THEN PLESE SPECIFY THE TIME LIMIT UPTO WHICH ACTION WOULD BE TAKEN. 4. IF NO ACTION HAS YET BEEN TAKEN ON ABOVE REFERRED APPLICATION DATED 19.01.2015, THEN PLESE INTIMATE THE NAME & DESIGNATIONS OF THE OFFICIALS RESPONSIBLE FOR NOT TAKING ANY ACTION. 5. PLEASE PROVIDE THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FILE/DOCUMENT ON WHICH APPLICATION DATED 19.01.2015, REFERRED ABOVE, HAS BEEN/IS BEANG DEALT IN CIC.
314 Intessar Ahmed CICOM/R/2015/60204/1
1) Please arrange to provide following information / documents in Relation to Non-complied CIC order No. CIC/SG/A/2012/001302/19309/VS dated: 26-10-2012 despite reminders and provision made vide Complaint Nos.CIC/WB/C/2008/00859, 862 & 863 dated 15.9.2008. I have made numerous complaints through e-mail and in writing were sent however neither information has been received nor any communication form the public authority as well as CIC has been received. a) Please provide action taken details and entire documents which have been generated as a result of aforesaid correspondence made for getting complied the order passed by the CIC. b) Please provide a Daily Progress Report from the date of Letter /application /e-mail complaint up to the date of supplying the information in the following format: 1)Date in 2) Receipt ref. 3) Name & Designation of official 4) Details of action taken by official 5) Date out 6) Dispatch ref.7) Period c) Please provide all applicable/specified timelines as to, according to your citizens charter or rules/regulations, the no. of days it takes for such a work to be processed at each step. d) If you have a timeline for stage-wise handling of the matter, provide a copy of the same. e) If no action has been taken at all or by any concerned official, please state reasons. f) Please provide the names, designations and current official contact details of those erring officers who were supposed to take action but who have not done so, or have not adhered to the time limits specified in Citizen Charter of CIC / your Ministry. g) Please state the names and contact details of controlling authorities of those officials/employees who were supposed to take action. h) Such a lapse renders one guilty of misconduct. Please advise what action is specified against guilty officials. I will file a separate application to know if you have taken that action. i) Disobeying any direction of law renders a public servant liable to be punished under section 166 of Indian Penal Code. Please advise if you will file a criminal complaint against guilty officials. If yes, please advise by when. If not, I will be forced to do so. j) Please provide the names, designations and present contact details of employees of your organization against whom disciplinary/departmental action was initiated in the last two calendar/financial years and the current year on account of dereliction of duties. k) Please state the name, postal and email address, phone numbers and website details of principal Secretary of the ministry to which your organization directly or indirectly reports. l) Please explain the complete procedure followed when the appropriate authority receives such a letter/application/complaint. m) Now by when order passed by the CIC will be got complied. n)Details of action taken on PIO and Appellate authority of the Public authority who consistently failed to comply with the said direction
Not Available
315 Ramesh P CICOM/R/2015/60211
Dear Public Information Officer, This request of information is regarding the number of RTI requests filed in all of the public authority under Central,State and UT Information Commissions. 1.Total number of requests for information under RTI act that have been filed till April 30, 2015 from the implementation of the act, under every public authority of Central government as well as state and UT governments and any other as such public authority under RTI act 2.Also requesting the year-wise distribution of these requests under various public authorities against the concerned various Information Commissions. 3.Total number of RTI First Appeals that have been filed till April 30, 2015 from the implementation of the act, under every public authority of Central government as well as state and UT governments and any other as such public authority under RTI act 4.Also requesting the year-wise distribution of these First Appeals under various public authorities against the concerned various Information Commissions. 5.Total number of RTI Second Appeals that has been filed till April 30, 2015 from the implementation of the act, under every public authority of Central government as well as state and UT governments and any other as such public authority under RTI act 6.Also requesting the year-wise distribution of these Second Appeals under various public authorities against the concerned various Information Commissions. 7.Total number of Direct Complaints to Information Commissions has been filed till April 30, 2015 from the implementation of the act, under every public authority of Central government as well as state and UT governments and any other as such public authority under RTI act 8.Also requesting the year-wise distribution of these Direct Complaints to various Information Commissions. 9.Requesting the total number of cases in which a Public Information Officers have been penalized i.e. fined by the various information commissions and its distribution against the various information commissions. 10.Total number of APIO and PIO under various information commissions at present under RTi act 2005. 11. The total number of Requests under RTI act filed by Below Poverty Line Person till April 30, 2015 from the implementation of the act, under every public authority of Central, state and UT governments and any other as such public authority under RTI act Note: Please note that the above required details are requiring only a number value against various Information Commissions and year-wise distribution and nothing more. Also provide me with information as early as possible. Requesting the information as hard copy if the total number of pages of the response is within 100 and if the response is more please provide them only as soft copy in Compact Disk. For further details or payment of fee if any, please contact in English to my E-mail ID rameshias5@gmail.com or my address provided above. Thanking You
Not Available
316 Arun Kumar Singh CICOM/R/2015/60217
Application under section 6(1) of Right to Information Act, 2005 Date: - 24-05-2015 To The CPIO Shri K.L.Das, Designated Officer and Deputy Registrar The Central Information Commission August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi - 110 066. Sir, I being citizen of India being BPL as determined by Govt. of West Bengal vide Ration card No 0061207 of 2012 most humbly & respectfully pray for following information under the act u/s 2(f) which are summarized below:- 1.Kindly provide information with appropriate copy and file noting and as per the decision under File No. CIC/SS/C/2013/900431/KY Decided on 15-04-2015 norms and policy under which complaint registered under No. RC/UG/13/856dgri and sent subsequently sent to the commission clearly stating as Complaint u/s 18(b) & 18(c) of the RTI Act, 2005 since no response was provided by concerned CPIO as stipulated under section 7(1) of the RTI Act, 2005. 2.Kindly provide information with appropriate copy of the rules, and procedure under which the said Complaint was treated as Second Appeal instead of complaint since CPIO has not at all responded to RTI Application attached there under and this cause of action is sufficient to file the complaint under provisions of section 18 (c ) of the RTI Act, 2005 3.Kindly provide information on why no attempt was made to examine the records in the aid of section 18(4) of RTI Act, 2005 instead the same was treated as Second Appeal as per whim and fancy of officials instead of statutory stipulation as per the legislative intent of the Act. 4.Kindly provide information on why in the Notice for appearance in schedule hearing on 15-04-2015 there was no direction or advised or expressed instructions to attend the same in local District Studio of NIC of the applicant (this applicant) wherein in most of the cases Honble Commission adopt this practice depriving me the opportunity of hearing. 5.Kindly provide copies of registry entries, endorsement, file noting etc. as applicable as per your rules and procedure. Thanking you Sd/- Arun Kumar Singh
317 S.S. CHAWLA CICOM/R/2015/60229
Kindly refer to File no. CIC/KY/A/2015/000102, the respondents submitted the copies of letter dated 30.10.2014 and 07.11.2014 during the hearing on 29.05.2015. In the matter, CPIO concern please furnish the true copies of both the letters dated 30.10.2014 and 07.11.2014.
Not Available
318 S.S. CHAWLA CICOM/R/2015/60231
Applicant received the copy of notice for hearing against File No.CIC/KY/C/2014/000238 dated 29.04.2015. The applicant had requested through his e-mail dated 13.05.2015 to the Honourable Commission for exemption to present my case in person before the Commission (Copy enclosed). In the matter, the CPIO concern please furnish the certify copies of file notings wherein the Commission endorsed its decision on applicant e-mail dated 13.05.2015.
319 S.S. CHAWLA CICOM/R/2015/60232
Kindly refer to File No. CIC/KY/A/2015/000102, the respondents submitted the copies of letters dated 30.10.2014 and 07.11.2014 during the hearing on 29.05.2015. In this regard, the CPIO concern please furnish the true copies of both the letters dated 30.10.2014 and 07.11.2014.
Not Available
320 S.S. CHAWLA CICOM/R/2015/60233
Applicant received the copy of notice for hearing against File No.CIC/KY/C/2014/000238 dated 29.04.2015. The applicant had requested through his e-mail dated 13.05.2015 to the Honourable Commission for exemption to present my case in person before the Commission (Copy enclosed). In the matter, the CPIO concern please furnish the certify copies of file notings wherein the Commission endorsed its decision on applicant e-mail dated 13.05.2015.
321 Sushant CICOM/R/2015/60268
In CIC order No. : CIC/DS/A/2013/000210 dated 22.07.2013 (Sushant vs Ut Of Chandigarh), CIC asked the Appellate Authority to obtain the explanation of the Concerned CPIO in writing for not providing the information in time and to forward the same to CIC along with his comments within 3 weeks of receipt of the Order to decide on imposition of penalty on the CPIO in terms of Section 20(1) of the RTI Act. Has the Appellate Authority sent the explanation to CIC alongwith comments Yes / No If yes, please provide a copy of the same.
Not Available
322 Anand Nallan CICOM/R/2015/60273/2
I have updated a Change of Address pertains to my Second appeal with CIC/CC/A/2015/900642 dated 05-01-2015 and admitted by SA/UG/15/399exop. The letter is docketed at your end 134271 dated 25-05-2015. Please provide the following information. (1) My admitted appeal is not came for hearing for more than 90 days. Already 180 days elapsed. May i know the reason for delay in taking up the case for hearing such a long time, more than time described in RTI act as maximum 90 days under clause 19(3) of RTI act. (2) I have submitted my Change in Address request duly docketed at your end on 25 May 2015 vide 134271. No confirmation letter received from your end nor updated in online records. May i know the Change in address is updated at your end (3) CIC bench has issued judgement CIC/BS/A/2014/000282/6746 dated 12 January 2015 against my DoT related RTI. The DoT has not made compliance to CIC order as on date, despite several reminders. The copy of the same letters were also addressed to CIC. I believe CIC will take action on one fine morning against such non-compliance. What is the procedure for handling non-compliance by such CIC final hearing orders by CPIOs and AAs (4) How many admitted second appeals were pending for more than 90 days at CIC for hearing (5) Essential data like option to choose RTI under Life and Liberty was removed from RTOonline portal. How to put RTI under Life and Liberty clause 7(2) of RTI act through online portal and do further first appeal (6) Certain CPIOs are diverting the RTI applications to other CPIOs under clause 5(2) of RTI act, though it is pertains to them with ill motivated interest to delay the reply. How CIC is taking control over them to oblige RTI act and prevent them from misuse. (7) How many times CIC has imposed action as per clause 20(2) on CPIOs and AAs for non compliance to RTI act in the past 3 years. (8) How many times CIC has imposed penalty rs. 250 per day as per clause 20(1) on CPIOs and AAs for non compliance to RTI act in the past 3 years. (9) How many times applicant sought relief in the admitted second appeal by CIC for action against defaulted CPIOs and AAs under clause 20(1) and 20(2) in the past 2 years. (10) Provide name and contact details of present Chief Central Commissioner. Also, provide role, duty and function of Chief Information Commissioner by email ID to anand_win@hotmail.com
Not Available
323 Anand Nallan CICOM/R/2015/60273/5
Point no. 1 & 2 are concerned to you. I have updated a Change of Address pertains to my Second appeal with CIC/CC/A/2015/900642 dated 05-01-2015 and admitted by SA/UG/15/399exop. The letter is docketed at your end 134271 dated 25-05-2015. Please provide the following information. (1) My admitted appeal is not came for hearing for more than 90 days. Already 180 days elapsed. May i know the reason for delay in taking up the case for hearing such a long time, more than time described in RTI act as maximum 90 days under clause 19(3) of RTI act. (2) I have submitted my Change in Address request duly docketed at your end on 25 May 2015 vide 134271. No confirmation letter received from your end nor updated in online records. May i know the Change in address is updated at your end (3) CIC bench has issued judgement CIC/BS/A/2014/000282/6746 dated 12 January 2015 against my DoT related RTI. The DoT has not made compliance to CIC order as on date, despite several reminders. The copy of the same letters were also addressed to CIC. I believe CIC will take action on one fine morning against such non-compliance. What is the procedure for handling non-compliance by such CIC final hearing orders by CPIOs and AAs (4) How many admitted second appeals were pending for more than 90 days at CIC for hearing (5) Essential data like option to choose RTI under Life and Liberty was removed from RTOonline portal. How to put RTI under Life and Liberty clause 7(2) of RTI act through online portal and do further first appeal (6) Certain CPIOs are diverting the RTI applications to other CPIOs under clause 5(2) of RTI act, though it is pertains to them with ill motivated interest to delay the reply. How CIC is taking control over them to oblige RTI act and prevent them from misuse. (7) How many times CIC has imposed action as per clause 20(2) on CPIOs and AAs for non compliance to RTI act in the past 3 years. (8) How many times CIC has imposed penalty rs. 250 per day as per clause 20(1) on CPIOs and AAs for non compliance to RTI act in the past 3 years. (9) How many times applicant sought relief in the admitted second appeal by CIC for action against defaulted CPIOs and AAs under clause 20(1) and 20(2) in the past 2 years. (10) Provide name and contact details of present Chief Central Commissioner. Also, provide role, duty and function of Chief Information Commissioner by email ID to anand_win@hotmail.com
Not Available
324 Abhishek Modak CICOM/R/2015/60300
Kindly inform me the following with regard to Complaint / Appeals filed before the Central Information Commission (CIC) by Abhishek Modak with Diary No. 147187 dated 3/7/2013 (Ministry of Youth Affairs & Sports) & Diary No. 125160 dated 9/4/2013 (Ministry of Finance): 1. The Information Commissioner before whom the cases are pending presently. 2. The date of hearing of the cases by the CIC. 3. The names of officers who have dealt with the Cases as listed above. 4. The dates of file movement and the names of persons who have handled the cases. 5. The corresponding File No.s of the above mentioned cases. 6. Contact No. & Name of Officers to be contacted for status of the cases. 7. Name of officers who are presently in charge of the case files. Provide the above mentioned information along with the details as mentioned above to my residential address as mentioned below. Screenshot of status as shown in CIC Website is attached and relevant cases are highlighted in yellow. Abhishek Modak 5 Ramani Chatterjee Road Fort Terrazzo Flat No. 4F Kolkata 700029 Mobile 9836514477
325 Rejimon C K CICOM/R/2015/60303/2
Point no. 9, 10, 12 & 13 are concerned to you. 2.Please provide reason recorded(in case any rule or order in this effect may provide) for not keeping the copy of the Annual Asset Report of staff posted in CIC and not posting at CIC website. 3.Reason recorded for not disclosing complete details on Cadre posted staff working in CIC under cic.gov.in/Sec-4-Index.htm. The RTI Reply of 27/11/2014 CIC mislead by stating that the list of posted staff is available on RTI Disclosure link 4.Please provide reason for not transferring the RTI ID no. 60186 to parent cadres. 5.Reason recorded for not appointing the CVO in CIC. Have CIC got an exemption for the same, if so please provide details through CIC Website. Please provide as per CVC current mechanism to handle existing corruption in CIC. 6.Please inform in the absence of CVO please provide name of the official acted as CVO or in case no action taken on complaints of irregularities and preventive vigilance, have the same as per record informed the CVC If so details thereof. please provide name and designation of the hierarchy responsible for initiating the appointment of CVO. 7.It was informed there is No mechanism exists in CIC to check the misuse of authority. Please provide reason recorded for not initiating or establishing the system and please provide name and designation of the hierarchy responsible for initiating the same. 8.As per record, have CIC complied with cic.gov.in/GuidelinesOnProActive.pdf DoPT circular dated 15/4/2013 9.As per DoPT cirucular F.No.1/1/2013-IR dated 9th July 2015 for suo moto disclosure of RTI Applications received to avoid duplicate. 10.Please provide the status of Complaints filed u/s 18 with CIC and their Monthly and Annual Report through CIC website. 11.Please provide the provision under which compensation could be sought by appellant under RTIA 2005 for delay of information, if till date total compensation granted by CIC year wise. 12.Please provide the type of facility that is available at CIC for common man who are not literate or not competent to draft Appeals and complaints nor present in hearing or arguments. 13.As per RTIA 2005 any citizen may seek information under RTIA 2005 in a plain simple application, however, when a citizen is denied information or delayed they were asked in specific format the appeal or complaint by CIC with so many information sought. Please provide have CIC made any provision for citizen who are handicapped in seeking justice from CIC 14.There is no disciplinary Acton recommended against the FAA & PIO. Please provide reason recorded for not penalising the FAA for not conducting the hearing u/s 19(1) of RTIA 2005. 15.CIC itself received 2336 RTI Application & 811 Appeals expose the example how CIC not keeping Transparency. rti.india.gov.in/viewservice.php
Not Available
326 Sanjay Thul CICOM/R/2015/60304/1
Please provide the following information year wise since 2005 to 2015. (a) Total No of appeal disposed. (b) Total number of appeal rejected. (c)Total number of appeal allowed. (d) Total number appeal in which penalty has been imposed. (e) Total amount of penalty imposed. (f) Total amount of penalty paid by the respondent. (g) Cases in which respondent has not paid the penalty.
Not Available
327 USHA DEVI CICOM/R/2015/60308
SEVA ME, SHRI VIJAY BHALLA JI, DEPUTY REGISTRAR &CPIO CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION NEW DELHI 110066 KRIPYA REGISTRATION NO.CICOM/R/2014/00691 DATED-:29/12/2014 KA SANDARBH LENE KI KRIPA KI JAYE JISME PARA NO.2 (II) KE NICHE ME YAH LIKHA HAI KI please note that the above written reply dated-:06.12.2014 of the CPIO is under examination of the commission. KRIPYA COMMISSION ME KYA NIRNAY LIYA GAYA BATANE KI KRIPA KI JAYE. AAPKA VISWASI USHA DEVI
Not Available
328 Alok Kumar CICOM/R/2015/60310
With reference of my second appeal in Central Information Commission, New Delhi hearing on 08.08.2014 and Decision No. CIC/DS/A/2013/902445/VS/07650 Appeal No. CIC/DS/A/2013/902445/VS Dt. 13.08.2014 please provide the following information under RTI Act.- 1.What action has taken by II appellate authority against the respondent, after the hearing and decision in favor of appellant. 2.As a nodal agency of RTI Act, it is to confirm that the action taken by you either appropriate or on the recommendation under RTI Act, 2005 under 7 (1) Rs. 250/- per day. 3.Kindly informed if I disagree or unsatisfied with your decision/action, who is the higher appellate authority to appeal in this case. Thanking You,
329 SHRI KANT SHEKHAR CICOM/R/2015/60313
SEVA ME, CPIO, CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION, NEW DELHI-110066 Mere APPLICATION DATED -:12-06-2015 me kya karyayaiee ki gayi. KRIPYA BATANE KI KRIPA KI JAYE. AAPKA VISWASI SHRI KANT SHEKHAR
Not Available
330 Amit K Gupta CICOM/R/2015/60327
I like to compare no of second appeal registered online in CIC website versus total no of signed copy received by CIC. Therefore, request you to provide following information - 1. Total number of second appeals registered at CIC website with year on year basis (or financial year basis) available with CIC. 2. Total no of signed copy received by the CIC (again year on year basis). 3. Total no of second appeal or requests disposed per year. (YoY basis). 4. Total no of pending cases with CIC (YoY basis). 5. Please tell me where such complete statistics are available in public domain. I am unable to find in CIC website. Many thanks.
Not Available
331 Adv. Ankit Mulchand Mota CICOM/R/2015/60342
Information as to The information/report(all) submitted by the Ministry of Railway under Section 25(2) of the Right to Information Act,2005 for the year 2014-2015 and certified true copies of same on requisition.
Not Available
The information/report submitted by the Ministry of Railway under Section 25(2) of the Right to Information Act,2005 for the year 2014-2015 is under preparation.This report will be uploaded on CIC website after approval.
332 Raju Prasad CICOM/R/2015/60352
Dear Sir, Damodar Valley Corporation , DVC tower , VIP road Kolkata-54 , comes under Ministry of Power , however while filing online application of RTI under ministry of Power the name of Damodar Valley corporation does not appears as public authority under Ministry of Power . you are requested to provide following information under RTI Act-2005. 1. Under which ministry online RTI application against Damodar Valley can be filed. Thanking You, Raju Prasad House Name- Matri AAGYA, New Colony, Kumhar Toli, Hazaribag, Jharkhand-825301
Not Available
333 Sushant CICOM/R/2015/60353
A letter dated 27.07.2015 (copy attached) was sent to CIC. The applicant seek following information pertaining to this letter:- 1.Provide date of receipt of abovementioned letter in concerned office 2.Provide chronological sequence of events and actions taken by officers / staff in processing abovementioned letter, along with relevant documentary evidences: a.Name and designation of the concerned officer b.Action taken or procedure followed by concerned officer c.Date of disposal of the matter by concerned officer 3.Provide exact status of abovementioned letter at present
334 RAJENDER K RAMCHANDANI CICOM/R/2015/60364
REGARDING INFORMATION OF SENT ACTION TAKEN LETTER DATED (19TH AUGUST 2015) BY DAPARTMENT OF ADMINISTARTIVE REFORMS 7 PUBLIC GREAIVANCES TO CIC FOR NECESSARY ACTION. (ATTACHED HEREWITH THIS RTI APPLICATION). FURNISH ME THE CERTIFIED COPY OF SOU MOTU ACTION TAKEN REPORT AFTER SENT LETTER BY DARPG OFFICE ALONG WITH ALL NOTINGS & CORRESPONDENCE LETTERS FROM ANY AUTHOROTY.
335 Rajhans Trehan CICOM/R/2015/60373
Please provide the certified copy of all the documents in file no. CIC/SH/C/2014/000405. Thank you.
Not Available
336 Rajhans T CICOM/R/2015/60375
Please provide the certified copy of all the documents in the file no. CIC/VS/A/2014/000057.
Not Available
337 SAURABH KUMAR DIXIT CICOM/R/2015/60419/2
pOINT NO.1(B2,B6,B7,B8,B10,B11)
338 J P SHAH CICOM/R/2015/60473/2
Point no. 1, 2, 3 is concerned to you. For the months of June 2015 to Sept 2015 month-wise 3.1 Total number of appeals and complaints received. 3.2 Total number of appeals and complaints returned or rejected without admitting for hearing/decision. 3.3 Total number of appeals and complaints admitted for hearing. 3.4 Reasons assigned for not admitting appeals and complaints at least top 5 reasons, if not all reasons 3.5 Names and designations of employees of CIC who undertake scrutiny of appeals and complaints. 3.6 Number of appeals and complaints pending admission for signed copy awaited reason as on last day of above months. .
339 Kush Sharma CICOM/R/2015/60490/2
Point no. 1, 2, 3, 4 & 7 are concerned to you. Provide the detailed, point-wise information in regard to the following points: 1. Provide the number of RTI applications and appeals received by the Union government in 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16 so far, Ministry/Department/Organisation-wise 2. Provide the number of RTI applications and appeals pending with the Union government in 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16 so far, Ministry/Department/Organisation-wise 3. Provide the number of RTI applications and appeals rejected by the Union government in 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16 so far, Ministry/Department/Organisation-wise 4. Provide the details on amount collected as application fee, additional charges and penalty by public authorities in 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16 so far, head-wise and ministry-wise 5. Supply the details on the sanctioned strength and actual strength of the staff at Central Information Commission (CIC) and State Information Commissions, state-wise 6. Provide the number of appeals and RTI applications received, pending and rejected by the State Information Commissions in 2014-15 and 2015-16 so far, state-wise 7. Supply the number of cases where disciplinary action has been taken against any officer in respect of administration of the RTI act in 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16 so far, Ministry/Department/Organisation-wise
Not Available
340 SUHAS VAIDYA CICOM/R/2015/60497
Please provide me the position of Implementation of circular No 1/6/2011-IR issued by Govt of India, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions, Department of Personal & Training dated 15th April 2013 by way of copies of audit reports submitted to CIC by all nationalised banks i.e. Allahabad Bank, Andhra Bank, Bank of Baroda, Bank of India, Bank of Maharashtra, Canara Bank, Central Bank of India, Corporation Bank, Dena Bank, IDBI Bank, Indian Overseas Bank, Oriental Bank of Commerce, Punjab & Sindh Bank, Punjab National Bank, Syndicate Bank, UCO Bank, Union Bank of India, United Bank of India, Vijaya Bank and State Bank of India. Please provide name and addresses of the nodal officers appointed by these entities who are entrusted with ensuring the discloser of the information as per the proactive disclosure guidelines as above. Please provide the action taken against the banks named above for not implementation of the above guidelines with in stipulated time of 6 months form 15th April 2013. The guideline circular quoted above is attached for ready reference.
341 Rajhans Trehan CICOM/R/2015/60514
This is with ref. to the file no. CIC/SH/C/2014/000405. The decision of the said case was announced on 13-Oct-2015. Please provide the certified copy of the postal receipt of the decision sent to the CPIO and the FAA.
Not Available
342 Ranadheer Beeravelli CICOM/R/2015/60517/2
Point no. 2, 3 concerned to you. Hello Sir/madam, Greetings for the day, Kindly provide me the below information: 1) What is the annual budget allocated to CIC for each financial year since FY2005-06 till date, each year 2) How many RTI requests are filed till now since RTI act existence and how many requests are disposed off(Kindly provide the data month and year wise) 3) How many online RTI requests are filed till now since RTI act existence and how many requests are disposed off(Kindly provide the data month and year wise) 4) How many officers are penalized for not disposing the RTI requests in time. 5) How much amount has been spent by CIC and the corresponding ministry over awareness programs Thanks in advance
Not Available
343 Dr. Vidyanand Thakur CICOM/R/2015/60521
Please furnish the FOUR CORNERS of section 2(f) of RTI Act 2005 regarding meaning of information, which has been quoted in Para 2 of decision of the IC, CIC dated 14.10.2015 vide File No. CIC/SH/A/2015/ 000924/KY. It is pertinent to note that the information furnished is to be vetted & submitted in the court of law where it may show the mirror to said IC, CIC in that decision itself and Where it is to reviewed by the honorable court of law that, (i)Under which section of RTI Act 2005, the information furnished in Non-document form by interpreting facts by the CPIO, DPE in reply of DPENT/R/2014/60034 that other benefits in DPEs O.M. dated 1.6.2011 refers to all benefits linked to basic pay has been upheld by the IC, CIC without application of mind in its decision pronounced vide File No. CIC/SH/A/ 2014/ 002234/KY which is, at one hand, not allowed under this act, on the other hand, facts wise it is arbitrary since, (a)when the JS, DPE & FAA itself has admitted that the DPEs O.M. dated 1.6.2011 does not define other benefits as well as, (b)when the observation of the anomalies committee regarding its consideration part of NPA as Pay in 1997 pay revision is FALSE vide CILs O.M. dated 17.08.2001 as well as vide NALCOs O.M. dated 03.08.2001 itself, Then even a BLIND person cannot say that the said other benefits refers to ALL BENEFITS LINKED TO BASIC PAY but which has been UPHELD by the learned IC, CIC, Shri. M A Khan Yusufi and lastly, (c)In view of decision in File No.CIC/SH/A/2014/902903/KY upholding the view of CPIO, DPE vide its reply against DPENT/R/2014/60344 that the DPE did not receive any proposal of M/o Mines, This issue of NPA is deemed to be considered illegally by the DPE as prescribed under Para 18 of DPEs own O.M. dated 26.11.2008 and, In that case of illegal consideration, when any decision, as such, in DPEs O.M. dated 1.6.2011 cannot be a legal decision then even the honorable court of law may not uphold SUCH views of CPIO, DPE but which has been done so by the IC, CIC in its decision in File No. CIC/SH/A/ 2014/002234 and, Which appears to be rather a fixed/preoccupied view of IC, CIC. In this purview is obvious to see that the decision pronounced in File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/002234/KY is CONTRADITORY to those in File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/902903/KY as well as in CIC/SH/A/2015/000263/KY & CIC/SH/A/2015/000924/KY.
344 Dr. Vidyanand Thakur CICOM/R/2015/60522
Please furnish one copy each of decision pronounced against following file numbers, 1. File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/002234/KY. 2. File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/902903/KY. It is pertinent to note that the information furnished is to be vetted & submitted in the court of law where it is to reviewed by the honorable court of law that, (i) Under which section of RTI Act 2005, the information furnished against DPENT/R/2014/60034 in Non-document form by interpreting facts by the CPIO, DPE that other benefits in DPEs O.M. dated 1.6.2011 refers to all benefits linked to basic pay has been upheld by the IC, CIC without application of mind in its decision pronounced vide File No. CIC/SH/A/ 2014/ 002234/KY which is, at one hand, not allowed under this act, on the other hand, facts wise it is ARBITRARY since, (a) when the JS, DPE & FAA itself has admitted that the DPEs O.M. dated 1.6.2011 does not define other benefits as well as, (b) when the observation of the anomalies committee regarding its consideration part of NPA as Pay in 1997 pay revision is FALSE vide CILs O.M. dated 17.08.2001 as well as vide NALCOs O.M. dated 03.08.2001 itself, Then even a BLIND person cannot say that the said other benefits refers to ALL BENEFITS LINKED TO BASIC PAY but which has been UPHELD by the learned IC, CIC, Shri. M A Khan Yusufi and lastly, (c) In view of decision in File No.CIC/SH/A/2014/902903/KY upholding the view of CPIO, DPE vide its reply against DPENT/R/2014/60344 that the DPE did not receive any proposal of M/o Mines, This issue of NPA is deemed to be considered illegally by the DPE as prescribed under Para 18 of DPEs own O.M. dated 26.11.2008 and, In that case of illegal consideration, when any decision, as such, in DPEs O.M. dated 1.6.2011 cannot be a legal decision then even the honorable court of law may not uphold SUCH views of CPIO, DPE but which has been done so by the IC, CIC in its decision in File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/002234 and, Which appears to be rather a fixed/preoccupied view of IC, CIC. In this purview is obvious to see that the decision pronounced in File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/002234/KY is CONTRADITORY to those in File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/902903/KY as well as in CIC/SH/A/2015/000263/KY & CIC/SH/A/2015/000924/KY.
345 Dr. Vidyanand Thakur CICOM/R/2015/60523
Please furnish one copy each of decision pronounced against following file numbers, 1. File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/901883/KY 2. File No. CIC/SH/A/2015/000263/KY 3. File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/000924/KY It is pertinent to note that the information furnished is to be vetted & submitted in the court of law where it may show the mirror to the IC, CIC in these decision itself and where it is to reviewed by the honorable court of law that, (a) At one hand, the FALSE information furnished by the CPIO, DPE by interpreting facts in reply of DPENT/R/2014/60063 has been upheld by the learned IC, CIC shri M A Khan Yusufi without application of mind vide decision in File No.CIC/SH/A/2014/901883/KY, (b) On the other hand, the denial of furnishing a copy of the proposal of M/o Mines by the CPIO, DPE has been UPHELD by the said learned IC, CIC vide decision in File No. CIC/SH/A/2015/000263/KY & CIC/SH/A/2015/000924/KY in addition to that in File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/902903/KY on the ground that the information sought (copy of proposal of M/o Mines) is clarificatory in nature when contrary is the truth and besides that, The information furnished in Non-document form by interpreting the facts by the CPIO, DPE has been UPHELD by him vide decision in File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/002234/KY with the specific emphasis that, This decision pronounced in File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/002234/KY is CONTRADITORY to those in File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/902903/KY, CIC/SH/A/2015/000263/ KY & CIC/SH/A/2015/000924/KY and, thereby, In all the five decisions cited above, it is not a considered view of the commission rather it is a fixed/preoccupied view of learned IC, CIC, Shri. M A Khan Yusufi like a cricket match is fixed and whereby, (i) The appellant has been deprived from obtaining the SINGLE information in document form in 3 RTI application vide DPENT/R/2014/60344, 60402 & 60436 and consequent File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/902903, CIC/SH/A/2015/000263 & CIC/SH/A/2015/000924 and, Has been virtually forced to accept a FALSE information in decision vide File No. CIC/SH/A/2014/901883 against the same information sought (copy of proposal of M/o Mines) in DPENT/R/ 2014/60063, as well as, (ii) The said learned IC, CIC has FORCED the appellant to accept the FALSE information in DPENT/R/2014/60034 which has been furnished by CPIO, DPE in Non-document form by interpreting the same fact differently at two different places and, In this purview, the said IC, CIC has deviated from its duty where the basic object of the Right to Information Act is to empower the citizens, promote transparency and accountability in the working of the Government, contain corruption and make our democracy work for the people in real sense.
346 Varghese Yohannan CICOM/R/2015/60539/1
1. Kindly provide me a copy of the relevant pages of the Attendance register maintained by the o/o Prof.M.Sridhar Acharyulu, Information Commissioner which shows the attendance of the CPIO and other Officials of various Offices visited CIC to attend hearings on 19-10-2015. Para 2 pertains to NIC. 2. Please provide a transcript and video recordings of the hearing conducted by Prof.M.Sridhar Acharyulu, Information Commissioner on 19-10-2015 in respect of CIC Ref. No. CIC/RM/A/2014/004575-SA and Ref No. CIC/RM/A/2014/003485-SA. I am willing to pay the requisite fee for the above documents.
Not Available
347 S.S. CHAWLA CICOM/R/2015/60543
Refer File no. CIC/KY/C/2015/000054, the Honourable Commission pronounced its decision on 25.06.2015. The concern Information Commissioner had given its decision that CPIO had responded on 09.01.2015 (not 09.01.2014) and provided the required information. Further the FAA, who vide his order dated 09.05.2015, disposed of the FA. In the matter, concern CPIO please furnish the certify copies of both letters dated 09.01.2015 and 09.05.2015 alongwith complete relevant enclosures.
Not Available
348 Sandeep Jain CICOM/R/2015/60549
29th November 2015 To, Central Public Information Officer Central Information Commission August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place New Delhi - 110 066 Subject: Non-Compliance to CIC order CIC/SH/A/2015/900872/KY dated 15.10.2015 Request for Information under RTI Act 2005 Dear Sir, I have filed the complaint RC/UG/15/15367qf0f dated 29.11.2015 towards Non-Compliance to CIC order CIC/SH/A/2015/900872/KY dated 15.10.2015 by Department of Heavy Industries and Engineering Projects India Limited (attached as annexure). May kindly advice, if, I need to send the signed copy of the complaint and its annexures for kind perusal of Shri M.A. Khan Yusufi (Honourable Information Commissioner). Thanks and best regards, Sandeep Jain 2nd Floor, Chintangarh, Gulmohar Park, Aundh, Pune 411007, MH, India. T: 91 20 25896695 M: 91 8975758358 Place: Pune Date: 29/11/2015 Enclosed: As above.
349 VELMURUGAN G CICOM/R/2015/80004
From G. Velmurugan, Correspondent, Sri Aruna Nursery & Primary School, 37 & 38 Ayyakkannu Mudali Street, Tiruvannamalai 606 601, Tamil Nadu. e-mail:gvelmurugan1965@gmail.com To The Central Information Commissioner, New Delhi. Sir, Sub: RTI Applications Request for direction to reply Regarding. Ref: 1) My complaint by reg. post against Syndicate Bank, Manipal, to CIC., B&C Wing, New Delhi-66, dt: /24/07/2014. 2) My RTI application by reg. post to Public Information Officer, CIC., B&C Wing, New Delhi-66, dt: 24/07/2014. 3) My appeal by reg. post to CIC., Room No.326, 2nd Floor, New Delhi-66, dt:17/09/2014. 4) My representation/complaint by reg. post to Shri. Vijai Sharma, Information Commissioner, Room No.4, Club Building, new Delhi-66, dt:13/10/2014. 5) My representation /complaint by fax to Shri. M.A. Khan Yusufi, Appellate Authority, CIC., Room No.308, 2nd Floor, August Kranti Bhavan, New Delhi-66, dt: 27/11/2014. Id like to draw your attention to the reference 1-5. My RTI application dt:21/04/2014, sent to Syndicate Bank, Manipal, was in limbo. When I appealed to the Appellate Authority of Syndicated Bank, Manipal, my RTI application was forwarded to Public Information Officer, Syndicate Bank, Regional Office, Chennai, citing jurisdiction. I have, so far, not received any reply. I sent a complaint over non-rect. of reply to CIC., New Delhi, with some queries under RTI to Public Information Officer, CIC., New Delhi vide ref.1&2, but to no avail. In vain, I appealed by reg. post to CIC., New Delhi, vide ref.3. My representation/complaint as to the above to the Information Commissioner, new Delhi, vide ref.4, has cut no ice. My appeal to Sri. M. A. Khan Yusufi, Appellate Authority, CIC., vide ref.5, has evoked no response. The unresponsiveness of the officials concerned is deprecatory and prejudicial. I have enclosed the copies of documents under ref.1-5 for your ready reference and perusal. Kindly look into this and direct the authorities concerned to reply. Faithfully ,
350 DR A K SARIAL CICOM/R/2015/80005
The CPIO, Central Information Commission, New Delhi Sir, Kindly provide certified copies of document / letter submitted by CPIO, ICAR during hearing of the case no CIC/SH/C/2014/000099 in CIC office in support of statement that the complaint letter dated 12.8.2002 was checked with the office of DG and that the records for the year 2002 are not available. Thanks Yours sincerely, Dr. A. K. Sarial
Not Available
351 Dr. Ashok Kumar CICOM/R/2015/80012
To The CPIO, CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION, New Delhi. Kindly provide vedio CD of the recording of proceedings of the case no CIC/SH C/2014/000099 conducted through vedio conference on dated 24.11.2014. Thanks. Yours sincerely, Ashok Kumar
Not Available
352 SATINDER KUMAR DHAWAN CICOM/R/2015/80016
1.AS PER C.I.C DECISION dated 27-04-2014 against FILE No CIC/KY/C/2014/000202 GETTING INFORMATION AND ALSO PENAL ACTION IS NOT LEGALLY TENABLE 2AS PER GUIDE LINES SECTION 21 IMPOSITION OF PENALTY- AN APPLICANT UNDER THE ACT HAS A RIGHT TO APPEAL TO THE INFORMATION COMMISSION AND ALSO TO MAKE COMPLAINT TO THE COMMISSION. INFORMATION REQUESTED:SECTION 21- IMPOSITION OF PENALTY IS STILL IN VOYAGE.
353 B S K RAO CICOM/R/2015/80017
Attached 2nd Appeal Order of CIC bearing File No.CIC/KY/A/2015/000105 Dt.29.05.2015. Kindly provide me copy of the submissions made by respondent The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India as stated in the above mentioned appeal order. The order in question has been passed without giving me an opportunity of heard in Video Conferencing & also hits the very purpose of RTI Act to bring transparency in the system. If the information is not available with DARPG, kindly transfer this RTI to CIC U/s 6(3) of RTI Act.
354 Nagarjuna Avula CICOM/R/2015/80021
APPLICATION FOR INFORMATION UNDER RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005 From Dr. Avula Nagarjuna S/o A. Venkatramaiah H.No.16-1-210 Marrimanu Street Tirupati - 517 501 Chittoor District Andhra Pradesh Mobile:9550577370 To Central Information Commission 2nd Floor, B Wing August Kranti Bhavan Bhikaji Cama Place New Delhi - 110 066 Dear Sir Sub: Application for information of the second appeal against the Railway Institute, Vijayawada under the provisions of RTI Act, 2005 - rent details and on whose name registered the kalyanamandapam for my marriage dated 19-03-2011 at the venue Railway Institute, Beside D.R.M. Office, Opp. Railway Station, Vijayawada -Reg. Ref: 1. L. Dis. Lr. No. 5527/APIC-A/2015 dated 04/03/2015 2. RTI application to PIO, the Secretary, Railway Institute, Vijayawada dated 27/12/2014 Kindly provide me the following information below. My wife (Mrs. Chikkala Manju Latha Devi) has filed a case against me on the file of the family court, Vijayawada. She said in the court that her father paid rent Rs.24, 000/- for Kalyanamandapam (Railway Institute) and her father name is Mr. Chikkala Krishna Rao. My marriage held on 19-03-2011 at the venue Railway Institute, Beside D.R.M. Office, Opp. Railway Station, Vijayawada - 2 and photo copy of wedding invitation enclosed for information. Particulars of information required: 1.On whose name either Mr. S. Govindappa (railway employee at Vijayawada, mobile: 09346200555) or Mr. Chikkala Krishna Rao (real estate business at Vijayawada, mobile: 9014826843) the Kalyanamandapam venue (Railway Institute) was registered on 19-03-2011 for my marriage day 2.How much did they pay rent for Kalyanamandapam (Railway Institute) 3.Please provide me certified photo copies of receipts which registered for my marriage dated 19-03-2011 at the venue Railway Institute, Beside D.R.M. Office, Opp. Railway Station Vijayawada. Marriage venue details Manager Mr. Ch. Praveen ( Mobile:9618165167) Railway Institute, Beside D.R.M. Office, Opp. Railway Station, Vijayawada - 2 Please give me the certified copies of the above questions. I state that the information sought not fall within the restriction contained in Secs 8 & 9 of the RTI Act, 2005 and to the best of my knowledge it pertains to your good office. Yours sincerely Dr.A.Nagarjuna
Not Available
355 Narendra Sahoo CICOM/R/2015/80036
RTI
356 P. Bala Murali Krishna CICOM/R/2015/80041
I have missed filling my Second Appeal number in my RTI request DARPG/R/2015/60512 filed yesterday. Hence the same may be ignored. I am resubmitting my request, modified as follows: My second appeal No. SA/UG/14/24251lql4 (CIC/SH/A/2014/902995) is pending with CIC for about a year. I know that there are no time limits for settling second appeals, but I should at least know when is it likely that my case will be taken up for hearing. The waiting cannot be endless. Please let me know cases of which month and year are now being heard in CIC, and what is the probable month and year that my case will be taken up for hearing in CIC.
Not Available
357 P. Bala Murali Krishna CICOM/R/2015/80042
My second appeal No. is pending with CIC for about a year. I know that there are no time limits for settling second appeals, but I should at least know when is it likely that my case will be taken up for hearing. The waiting cannot be endless. Please let me know cases of which month and year are now being heard in CIC, and what is the probable month and year that my case will be taken up for hearing in CIC.
Not Available
358 Anil Agrawal CICOM/R/2015/80051/2
Point no. 2 is concerned to you. The CPIO, cENTRAL iNFORMATION cOMMISSION, nEW dELHI. I filed following 2nd appeals before CIC but not one of them is shown in the website of CIC under the column status of appeals. Pl inform me the preset position of y appeals. 1. Dated 02/09/2015 against I&B Ministry 2. Dated 01/09/2015 against Ministry of Corporate Affairs 3. Dated 19/10/2015 against Ministry of External Affairs Kindly let me know the no. and date of registration and disposal of my appeals The appeals are not shown in the website of CIC nor there is any response to my mails.
Not Available
359 Lashit Sharma CICOM/R/2015/80052
Respected Sir/Madam, Please provide the following information regarding the RTI applications filed under the Right to Information Act, 2005: 1. Since the Right to Information Act was enacted in 2005, what is the total number of RTI applications (both online and by post) that have been filed with the Central Government each year. 2. What has been the major mode of sending RTI applications to the Government, through the online portal or postal service. 3. The proportion of applications filed online to those sent offline over the years. 4. What has been the language used in the majority of RTI applications, Hindi or English. 5. The proportion of applications that used the English language and those that used Hindi. 6. What has been the sex of majority of applicants, male or female. 7. The proportion of male applicants to female to third gender applicants. 8. For those applications filed through the online portal, did the majority of applicants identified themselves as belonging to rural area or urban area. 9. What is the proportion of rural and urban area applications. 10. For those RTI applications filed through the online portal, how many of those were filed by people identifying themselves as being below the poverty line. 11. What is the proportion of applicants below poverty line and those above the poverty line. 12. As per applications filed through the online portal, how many illiterate applicants got their applications filed. 13. The proportion of illiterate to literate applicants. 14. The department/ministry/apex body to which maximum number of RTI applications were addressed to. 15. How many RTI applications went to the stage of First Appeal. Thank you
Not Available
360 Kumar Shailendra CICOM/R/2015/80057
To The Central Public Information Officer, Central Information Commission, (Ministry of Law and Justice) August Kranti Bhawan, Bikhaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110066 From: Full name of the applicant: Kumar Shailendra Postal Address of Applicant: Bhawani Bhawan, J N Road, Patna - 800003 Sir, The undersigned here by require the following particulars of information Subject matter: Case No CIC/AD/A/2009/001400 dated 16.11.09 (Mr Ajay Ojha Vs Ministry of External affairs) contains 21 pages Please furnish the following informations under RTI Act A)Please provide extra (more than 21) pages of Case No CIC/AD/A/2009/001400 dated 16.11.09 (Mr. Ajay Ojha Vs Ministry of External affairs). B)Please provide above mentioned file for personnel inspection at August Kranti Bhawan, New Delhi. Place : Patna Date: 30 Dec 2015 Signature Kumar Shailendra
Not Available
361 B K Gupta CICOM/R/2015/90004
Part of the application related to CIC, therefore, transferred under Section 6(3) to CIC. A copy of the application is also forwarded physically to CIC.
362 T JAY SHANKAR CICOM/R/2015/90005/1
Transfer under Section 6(3) for appropriate reply on their part.
Not Available
363 deepchandra Sharma CICOM/R/2016/00001
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
364 Jagdish Prasad Sah CICOM/R/2016/00004
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
365 G Veerabahu CICOM/R/2016/00018/1
point no.2(ii) is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
366 A R Shah CICOM/R/2016/00021
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
367 Sunil Kumar Sabul CICOM/R/2016/00022/1
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
368 Raghu S CICOM/R/2016/00025
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
369 Vimal Kumar CICOM/R/2016/00027
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
370 R S Sagar CICOM/R/2016/00028
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
371 Bajrang Lal Sharma CICOM/R/2016/00029
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
372 S R Nagwanshi CICOM/R/2016/00033
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
373 Madhu Sudan Dutta CICOM/R/2016/00034
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
374 M Mohan CICOM/R/2016/00045
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
375 R K Jain CICOM/R/2016/00048
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
376 Ved Prakash Gupta CICOM/R/2016/00049
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
377 Shravan Kumar CICOM/R/2016/00051
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
378 R K Jain CICOM/R/2016/00052/2
Point no.I is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
379 B Parameshwar CICOM/R/2016/00061/1
Point no.2 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
380 Madanlal CICOM/R/2016/00066
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
381 C L Pawar CICOM/R/2016/00069
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
382 E Ramanathan CICOM/R/2016/00072
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
383 Sanchar Anand CICOM/R/2016/00073
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
384 Vinod Kumar CICOM/R/2016/00080/2
Point no1,2 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
385 Vinod Kumar CICOM/R/2016/00080/4
point no.4 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
386 Ajay Kumar Bahl CICOM/R/2016/00082/5
point no.4,5 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
387 Naveen Kumar CICOM/R/2016/00083/1
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
Please see the uploaded file
388 R K Jain CICOM/R/2016/00085/1
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
389 Rajni Devi CICOM/R/2016/00088
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
390 Girish Prasad Gupta CICOM/R/2016/00091
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
391 Kaushal Kumar CICOM/R/2016/00092
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
392 Ishwar Sharan Katarha CICOM/R/2016/00095
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
393 R P Aspal CICOM/R/2016/00096
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
394 R K Jain CICOM/R/2016/00102
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
395 R K Jain CICOM/R/2016/00102/1
point no.A is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
396 Bimal Shankar Vishwakarma CICOM/R/2016/00104
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
397 Namita G Bhardwaj CICOM/R/2016/00105
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
398 Namita G Bhardwaj CICOM/R/2016/00106
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
399 J D Singh CICOM/R/2016/00110
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
400 Samit Gupta CICOM/R/2016/00112
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
401 R P Illango Yadav CICOM/R/2016/00120
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
402 Shanti Lal Jain CICOM/R/2016/00121/2
point no.1-8 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
403 Ishwar Chandra Gupta CICOM/R/2016/00135
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
404 Gajendra Singh CICOM/R/2016/00136
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
405 R K Jain CICOM/R/2016/00145
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
406 Kaushal Kumar CICOM/R/2016/00149
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
407 R K Jain CICOM/R/2016/00151
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
408 Vidhyadhar Pandey CICOM/R/2016/00154
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
409 Jagdish Pant CICOM/R/2016/00158
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
410 Sunil Sharma CICOM/R/2016/00166
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
411 Rajinder Parkash Aspal CICOM/R/2016/00182
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
412 R L Goyal CICOM/R/2016/00189
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
413 Mohd Haider CICOM/R/2016/00195
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
414 Harish Kumar CICOM/R/2016/00196
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
Please see the uploaded file
415 Naveen Jaspal CICOM/R/2016/00210/1
point no.5 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
416 Vinay Kumar CICOM/R/2016/00213
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
417 Sriram Choudhary CICOM/R/2016/00214
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
418 A S Gill CICOM/R/2016/00217
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
419 Gopal Chandra CICOM/R/2016/00222
Further fees of Rs.40 has been received to furnished the information. It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
420 Parvati Devi CICOM/R/2016/00228
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
421 Sanjeev Kumar CICOM/R/2016/00229/2
point no 4,5 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
422 Ayub Ali CICOM/R/2016/00230
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
423 Ayub Ali CICOM/R/2016/00230/1
points no.3,4 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
424 A M Attar CICOM/R/2016/00237
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
425 K V Krishnan CICOM/R/2016/00242
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
426 Jagdish Prasad Sah CICOM/R/2016/00250
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
427 Ritu Gupta CICOM/R/2016/00251
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
428 Rajeev Kumar Rai CICOM/R/2016/00258/1
Point no.1 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
429 Rajeev Kumar Rai CICOM/R/2016/00258/2
point no.7 transferred under section 5(2) of the RTI Act 2005 as it is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
430 Rajeev Kumar Rai CICOM/R/2016/00258/5
point no.7 transferred under section 5(2) of the RTI Act 2005 as it is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
431 Deepanshu Gupta CICOM/R/2016/00262
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
432 Maan Singh CICOM/R/2016/00264
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
433 Dr Balwinder Singh Bhatti CICOM/R/2016/00266
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
434 Dharambir Singh CICOM/R/2016/00271
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
435 Prasanta Basu Ray CICOM/R/2016/00276/2
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
436 Dharmesh Arora CICOM/R/2016/00279
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
437 M N Quarrashi CICOM/R/2016/00281
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
Please see the uploaded file
438 Shashi Bhushan Prasad CICOM/R/2016/00282
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
439 Prasanta Basu Ray CICOM/R/2016/00283
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
Please see the uploaded file
440 Rakesh Kumar CICOM/R/2016/00284
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
Please see the uploaded file
441 Prafulla Kumar Verma CICOM/R/2016/00288/1
point no.3.3, 3.4 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
442 Prafulla Kumar Verma CICOM/R/2016/00289/1
point no.3.3, 3.4 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
443 Tarachand CICOM/R/2016/00294
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
444 Jai Mehra CICOM/R/2016/00296
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
Please see the uploaded file
445 Shaji M K CICOM/R/2016/00298
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
Please see the uploaded file
446 R S Sagar CICOM/R/2016/00306
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
447 Chidanand Balappa Budruk CICOM/R/2016/00309
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
Please see the uploaded file
448 S Manoharan CICOM/R/2016/00311
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
449 Puspanjali Padhy CICOM/R/2016/00312
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
450 Dr M C Sharma CICOM/R/2016/00316/2
point no.1 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
Please see the uploaded file
451 Pramod Kumar Sharma CICOM/R/2016/00319
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
452 Rakesh Kumar CICOM/R/2016/00325/1
point no.3,4 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
Please see the uploaded file
453 Usha Kapoor CICOM/R/2016/00327
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
Please see the uploaded file
454 H K Bansal CICOM/R/2016/00328/1
Point no.1(d),2(1), 2(2),2(4),2(5),2(6),2(7),2(8),2(9),2(10)is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
455 Lokesh K batra CICOM/R/2016/00329
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
456 R Rajavel CICOM/R/2016/00340
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
Please see the uploaded file
457 Manoj Kumar CICOM/R/2016/00341
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
Please see the uploaded file
458 Bimal Shankar Vishwakarma CICOM/R/2016/00343
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
Please see the uploaded file
459 Manmohan Singh CICOM/R/2016/00350
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
460 S K Shrivastava CICOM/R/2016/00352
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
461 Vijay Prakash Gupta CICOM/R/2016/00363
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
462 Purushottam Kumar Jha CICOM/R/2016/00364
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
Please see the uploaded file
463 V Ananda Rao CICOM/R/2016/00390/3
It is informed that no information relating to writ petition no 26565/2010 (WP MP No 33928/2010) and writ petition no 26269/2010 ( WP MP No 33544/2010) are available in the Legal Cell. As the RTI Application pertains to CIC/SM/A/2010/000011 & CIC/SM/A/2010/000761, application is returned back to you for sending a suitable reply directly to the Appellant.
464 Yash Pal Singh CICOM/R/2016/00398
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
465 Babu Lal CICOM/R/2016/00399
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
466 Ujjal Kumar Datta CICOM/R/2016/00415
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
467 Anil Kumar Sinha CICOM/R/2016/00416/3
point no.2 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
468 Bimal Shankar Vishwakarma CICOM/R/2016/00422
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
469 Gyanendra Murari CICOM/R/2016/00425
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
470 Naveen Kumar CICOM/R/2016/00428
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
471 Dr Dhayal Kumar Patel CICOM/R/2016/00441
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
472 S R Gangurde CICOM/R/2016/00443
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
473 Gyan Prakash Singh CICOM/R/2016/00444
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
474 Madhu Sudan Dutta CICOM/R/2016/00446
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
475 Akhileshwar Sharma CICOM/R/2016/00447
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
476 Ashok Kumar Rana CICOM/R/2016/00453
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
477 Subhash Chander Arora CICOM/R/2016/00456
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
478 Sarfaraz Ahmed Khan CICOM/R/2016/00458/1
point no.3,4,5,6,7 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
479 Salim Ud Din CICOM/R/2016/00467
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
480 Prakashchand Chhaganmalji Jain CICOM/R/2016/00485
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
481 Ravinder Kumar CICOM/R/2016/00491/2
point no.3 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
482 Dilip Chatterjee CICOM/R/2016/00494
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
483 Shamik Nag CICOM/R/2016/00497
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
484 Ishwari Prasad CICOM/R/2016/00498/3
Point no.6,10 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
485 Atul Kumar CICOM/R/2016/00500
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
486 Ratan Prakash CICOM/R/2016/00502
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
487 Ramesh Verma CICOM/R/2016/00506
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
488 Atam Prakash Mehta CICOM/R/2016/00516
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
489 R K Aggarwal CICOM/R/2016/00519
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
490 Kamlesh Chand Dewan CICOM/R/2016/00526
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
491 N S Madkaiker CICOM/R/2016/00528
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
492 Kishori Lal CICOM/R/2016/00536
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
493 Lal Bachhan Ram CICOM/R/2016/00542
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
494 Naresh Kumar CICOM/R/2016/00547
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
495 P UMA MAHESWARA RAO CICOM/R/2016/00549
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
496 Ramesh Chand Aggarwal CICOM/R/2016/00555/1
Point no.1 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
497 Bharat Singh Kashyap CICOM/R/2016/00556
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
498 Satya Pal Singh CICOM/R/2016/00558
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
499 Girish Prasad Gupta CICOM/R/2016/00560
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
500 R K Sharma CICOM/R/2016/00571
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
501 D Roy Chowdhury CICOM/R/2016/00572
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
502 A B Bhattacharjee CICOM/R/2016/00578
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
503 Bishweshwar Paswan CICOM/R/2016/00584
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
504 Surendra Jain CICOM/R/2016/00592/1
Point no 2 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
505 P C Sekhar CICOM/R/2016/00594
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
506 Pawan Tiwari CICOM/R/2016/00597/2
Point no.1,2,3,9,10 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
507 Aseem Takyar CICOM/R/2016/00601
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
508 P S Sawhney CICOM/R/2016/00609
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
509 Sanjay Sharma CICOM/R/2016/00617/1
Point no 1,2,8,9 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
510 Sanjay Sharma CICOM/R/2016/00617/2
Point no. 5,6,7 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
511 Varun Mangal CICOM/R/2016/00618
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
512 Shyam Jit CICOM/R/2016/00619
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
513 Kusum Kalra CICOM/R/2016/00620
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
514 Jai Mehra CICOM/R/2016/00625
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
515 Anil Sood CICOM/R/2016/00637/2
Point no.D is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
516 Gorakh Nandand Vishwakrama CICOM/R/2016/00638
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
517 Pardeep Bajaj CICOM/R/2016/00653
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
518 Vasantha Dorai Raj CICOM/R/2016/50017
Ref: File No. CIC/VS/A/2014/902649/KY. I sent my written submission dated 02-09-15 by Registered post for consideration of the Commission in the hearing on 15-09-15. It was duly delivered to the Commission on 08-09-15. No reference has been made to it in the Commissions order. Please advise 1) if it was put up before the IC, 2) if it was considered by the IC, 3) the reasons under S. 4 (1) (d) of the RTI Act for omitting to make a reference to it in the order and 4) If it was not considered by the IC, the reasons therefor. The FAA failed to comply with the order of the IC. I sent a representation dated 12-11-15 which was duly delivered to the Commission on 16-11-15. Action taken or proposed to be taken thereon and its present status may be advised. Please advise the present correct e-mail address of Mr. K. A. Talwar, Deputy Registrar IC (KY) since his e-mail ID as given in the CICs website is incorrect and a mail sent to him to this ID has been returned undelivered with the reemark This user doesnt have a yahoo.co.in account (ka.talwar@yahoo.co.in) 0 - mta1194.mail.sg3.yahoo.com. Please also update the correct e-mail ID on your web portal.
519 vipin kumar CICOM/R/2016/50088/2
Point no. 1, 6, 8 are concerned to you. 1. Names along with contact details of the person/team responsible for updating CIC Online website. 2. Names along with the contact details of the person/team responsible for accessing and managing the email ID: rti@india.gov.in 3. The date and time of the last email received and sent from this email rti@india.gov.in 4. The name and contact details of the authority to whom the grievance can be registered if the email ID (rti@india.gov.in) is not working or active 5. The complete postal address where we are supposed to send the signed copy of the Second Appeal registered on the CIC Online website. 6. The exact web address giving the necessary information for sending the signed copy of the Second Appeal to CIC. 7. What are the documents that have to be signed and sent to CIC for the second appeal to be accepted by CIC. 8. The alternate official contact details of Shri Pankaj K. P. Shreyaskar, Web Information Manager of the CIC portal, other than the phone number 011-26717354 and email ID pkp.shreyaskar@nic.in as mentioned on the CIC Online website.
1) Names along with contact details of the person/team responsible for updating CIC Online website. CIC website is being maintained by NIC team . Sh Rakesh Malik is in charge of NIC in CIC. 6. The exact web address giving the necessary information for sending the signed copy of the Second Appeal to CIC. There is no web address for online receipt of signed copy of Appeals/ Complaints. You are requested to send hard copy of Appeal/ Complaint. 8. The alternate official contact details of 8. 8.Shri Pankaj K. P. Shreyaskar, Web Information Manager of the CIC portal, other than the phone number 011-26717354 and email ID pkp.shreyaskar@nic.in as mentioned on the CIC Online website. Ans Address will be updated shortly by NIC .
520 Manmohan Singh CICOM/R/2016/50100/2
Point no. 10 are concerned to you.
521 INDRA VIR SINGH CICOM/R/2016/50113
Sir, 1. My second Appeal under RTI Act 2005, was heard on 13.3.2013 and an order to provide information was issued vide File No. CIC/LS/A/2013/000522 but CPIO, PAO (OR) ASC South, Bangalore- 560007 did not provide the said information till date and CIC office did not take any action against the CPIO despite of my repeated requests to CIC office vide:- (a) Registered Post No. ED 863391931 IN dated 11.6.2013 addressed to Shri K.L. Das, Deputy Registrar. (b) E-mail dated 17.9.2013 addressed to deepakcic@gmail.com and kldas@nic.in. 2. I requested CIC office to intimate me about action taken against CPIO, PAO (OR) ASC (South) Banlaore vide:- (a) Online RTI Registration No. CICOM/R/2014/60260 dated 20.9.2014. (b) Online RTI Registration No. CICOM/R/2015/60365 dated 30.8.2015. 3. Despite of the above, the CIC office did not provide me the said information. So, now I again request under RTI Act 2005, to provide me the following information:- (a) Provide copy of directions/orders in which action against CPIO, PAO(OR) ASC South, Bangalore has been taken for non compliance of CIC order dated 13.3.2013. (b) In case no such order is issued to CPIO, PAO (OR) ASC South Bangalore, then provide me copy of the recorded reasons on file which compel the CIC office for not taking action under RTI Act 2005 against CPIO, PAO )OR) ASC South, Bangalore -560007. 4. The information requested in Para 3 (a) and 3 (b) may please be provided within stipulated time. I have paid due fee online.
Not Available
522 RISHABH TIWARI CICOM/R/2016/50120
Certified & approved copy of a decision of CIC in case of RAJINDER SINGH VS MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT case/appeal no. CIC/WB/A/2007/00731/L.S, in prescribed period under RTI act.
Not Available
523 GULSHAN KUMAR KHURANA CICOM/R/2016/50123
I sent a complaint to Central Commission Office on 28.1.2015 which was registered as file no. CIC/BS/A/2015/000248. Notice of hearing dated 15.2.2016 was received by me on 1st Mar 2016 after seven days of date of listing of the case i.e. 25.2.2016. Hence I could not participate in the hearing on 25.2.2016 while respondent did appear. The following information is required under RTI Act 1) Which are the pending cases I.e complaints and 2nd appeals are reflected in the online cause list of Commission. 2) Why the file no. CIC/BS/A/2015/000248 which was listed for hearing on 25.2.2016 was not reflected in the online cause list of the Commission. 3) How the communication (notice of hearing) was sent to the respondent in file no. CIC/BS/A/2015/000248. Whether it was sent by email or by registered/speed post. 4) If it was sent by speed/registered post, whether any receipt/number of the same is obtained from Post Office. If Yes Provide me the copy of the receipt/number of Post Office from where speed/registered post was sent. 5) If the communication (notice of hearing) was sent, to the respondent in file no. CIC/BS/A/2015/000248, by email, why the appellant not informed by email.
Not Available
524 MOSTOFA MOSLEHUDDIN AHMED CICOM/R/2016/50144
Respected Sir , I need the following information under RTI Act --2005. 1) I have filled a second appeal/complaint against the direct recruitment of MTS in the deptt. of posts , Assam State Circle (appeal no : SA/UG/15/9328h4uc) to CIC in the Month of May 2015. In the CIC web , status is written as :( Pendind for hearing /Disposal in the registry of CIC/IC shri Basant Seth / Complaint /appeal admitted ) and shows the file no as :CIC/BS/A/2015/901084. I want to know how do I get informed about the date of hearing . 2) Whether the hearing will be held in the state of Assam . 3) Through which office the hearing will be held . 4) Whether the decision/action of CIC is bound to the department of posts with immediate effect or not. 5) Will the decision/action be taken on the date of hearing . 6) Through which language the hearing will be held. ---With Regards--- MOSTOFA MOSLEHUDDIN AHMED VILL KATARA PO SANTIPUKHURI VIA SIPAJHAR PATHARIGHAT DIST DARRANG ASSAM PIN 784144
Not Available
525 MOSTOFA MOSLEHUDDIN AHMED CICOM/R/2016/50145
Respected Sir , I need the following information under RTI Act --2005 1) I have filled a second appeal/complaint against the direct recruitment of MTS in the deptt. of posts , Assam State Circle (appeal no : SA/UG/15/9328h4uc) to CIC in the Month of May 2015. In the CIC web , status is written as :( Pendind for hearing /Disposal in the registry of CIC/IC shri Basant Seth / Complaint /appeal admitted ) and shows the file no as :CIC/BS/A/2015/901084. I want to know how do I get informed about the date of hearing . 2) Whether the hearing will be held in the state of Assam . 3) Through which office the hearing will be held . 4) Whether the decision/action of CIC is bound to the department of posts with immediate effect or not. 5) Will the decision/action be taken on the date of hearing . 6) Through which language the hearing will be held. --With Regards-- MOSTOFA MOSLEHUDDIN AHMED VILL KATARA PO SANTIPUKHURI VIA SIPAJHAR PATHARIGHAT DIST DARRANG ASSAM PIN 784144
Not Available
526 Dibyendu Mondal CICOM/R/2016/50146/1
Point no. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 are concerned to you. Please provide me with the following informations 1 What is the total number of RTI application received since May2014 to March 2016 2 what are the number of RTI application received since 2005 to January 2014 3 How many applications has been rejected in these two periods separately period 1 and period 2 4 which departments has received the maximum and minimum RTI applications 5 Which department or ministry has rejected the maximum RTI applications 6 How many RTI applications has been received in regards to protection ones life and liberty since 2005 7 what is the average minimum and the maximum period that the CIC has achieved in disposal of RTI applications 8 how many RTI application has been esclated to the First appeal and how many to the CPIO
Not Available
Point no 1 to 5 .The information related to point no 1 to 5 are available in annual reports of the Commission . Annual Reports from 2005-06 to 2014-15 are available on cic website at http://cic.gov.in . Annual report for the year 2015-16 will be prepared in this year.
527 ved prakash verma CICOM/R/2016/50147
Copy of all records as to action taken by CIC on my complaint having no. CIC/BS/C/2014/000139 till date.
Not Available
528 T.Vijay Raghuveer CICOM/R/2016/50152/1
Point no. 3 (Part) is concerned to you. I would like to know the information about that what are the methods been followed by CIC to implement online portals for RTI in the states of our country. If any actions being taken by the government. Pls inform. I would also like to know that how many appeals been recieved by the commission till date from the initiation of the CIC. Please inform the serious and huge penalties imposed cases details Thanking you Sir
Not Available
Point no 3. DoPT had already implemented online portal for online registration and disposal of RTI request ( Url. http://rtionline .gov.in). Also users can registered online appeals and complaints through CIC website. The information regarding year wise appeals and complaints is available on cic website in annual reports and monthly disposal reports.
529 bharat bhushan CICOM/R/2016/50168
Please provide certified copies of all the documents, including note sheets, contained in file No. CIC/KY/A/2016/000199
Not Available
530 RAVI PRASAD CICOM/R/2016/50173
Kindly refer to the second appeal no CIC/CC/A/2015/002409 for which the hearing happened at on dated 03-03-2016, 12.15 Hrs. One month has passed but no decision has been published. Kindly provide the reason of delay along with the final decision.
Not Available
531 GULSHAN KUMAR KHURANA CICOM/R/2016/50175
I sent a complaint to Central Information Commission Office on 28.1.2015 which was registered as file no. CIC/BS/A/2015/000248. Notice of hearing dated 15.2.2016 was received by me on 1st Mar 2016 after seven days of date of listing of the case i.e. 25.2.2016. Hence I could not participate in the hearing on 25.2.2016 while respondent did appear. The following information is required under RTI Act 1) I understand that respondent i.e. CPIO has been informed by telephone by office of the CIC the date of hearing of the above complaint which was scheduled on 25th Feb 2016. Please advise me why the complainant was not informed by telephone. 2) Under which rule of the RTI Act or CIC the respondent has been informed the date of hearing by telephone.
Not Available
532 VODELA SURESH BABU CICOM/R/2016/50176
Action Taken Report on my letter dated 25-3-2016.
533 Rajhans Trehan CICOM/R/2016/50189
Ref. File no. CIC/KY/A/2016/000189. Please provide the certified copy of the attendance sheet signed and submitted by the appellant and the respondent at the time of the hearing.
Not Available
534 P Mahesh CICOM/R/2016/50195/3
Provide the information for the point No. 2 1. Furnish the names of the records duly cataloged and indexed u/s 4(1)(a) in the office of the Honble Central Information Commission. 2. Furnish the information of the seventeen manuals published u/s 4(1)(b) by the office of the Honble Central Information Commission. 3. Supply the xerox copies of the audited report of the office of the Central Information Commission.
Not Available
1. Kindly visit CIC website for various records and reports. 2. RTI Disclosure under Section 4(1)(b) is available on CIC website at cic.gov.in/ 3. No such audit report available in the Commission.
535 P Mahesh CICOM/R/2016/50195/6
Provide the information for the point No. 2 1. Furnish the names of the records duly cataloged and indexed u/s 4(1)(a) in the office of the Honble Central Information Commission. 2. Furnish the information of the seventeen manuals published u/s 4(1)(b) by the office of the Honble Central Information Commission. 3. Supply the xerox copies of the audited report of the office of the Central Information Commission.
Not Available
2. RTI Disclosure under Section 4(1)(b) is available on CIC website at cic.gov.in/
536 Ganapati B P CICOM/R/2016/50202
My Appeal to CIC (Number SA/UG/14/24226fj6z) in file Number CIC/BS/A/2014/902779 has been disposed of on 17 December 2015. But I have not received any notice/intimation/summons regarding the hearing. Kindly furnish the copy of the notice/intimation/summons that was served to me with its service details.
Not Available
537 Kishan Lal CICOM/R/2016/50213
RE: CASE NO. CIC/BS/C/2014/000294 WHICH IS PENDING SINCE 09/09/2014 1) Please provide list of all complaints/appeals registered in respect of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) after my aforesaid complaint. 2) Please provide list of complaints/appeals in respect of BSNL which were received after my complaint however decision has been passed by the commission. 3) Reasons and rationale behind granting preference to complaints/appeals which were received after me however scheduled for hearing before my complaint/appeal. 4) Please provide action taken details and documents which have been generated in respect of my numerous E-mails sent on the subject of REQUEST FOR EARLY HEARING OF CASE NO. CIC/BS/C/2014/000294 WHICH IS PENDING SINCE 09/09/2014. 5) Now by when my complaint NO. CIC/BS/C/2014/000294 will be scheduled for hearing.
Not Available
538 praveen poddar CICOM/R/2016/50217
Request for information under section 7(1) of RTI Act concerning life and liberty of a person to be provided within 48 hours Kindly inform action taken and date of action taken on email sent on 06/05/2016 to IC Sh M A Khan Yusufi with subject Email sent on 02/05/2016,File no. CIC/SS/A/2014/900349 for 2nd appeal hearing held on 06/05/2016, CVC Complaint 5420/2016 dated 01/02/2016 under process with CVC, Absence of response to request for audit of loss to government on account of delay in finalisation of disciplinary case arising from CVC ID Note No. Conf/2106/10/107479 dated 04/10/2010, Major Penalty Charge Memorandum dated 11/07/2011 issued by GM/CORE/ALD to Sh Praveen Poddar DyCEE/RE/NJP (now working as DyCEE/Coord/MLG/NFR) Copy of email without its attachments is available as supporting document. The email has also been forwarded to Dy Secretary Sh K A Talwar so that registry is aware of issues raised. REASONS FOR URGENCY: Email seeks Cognisance of 15 points as stated in Part B: Facts for taking decision w.r.t File No. CIC/SS/A/2014/900349 (Page 2 -17 of supporting document) partially summarised below to justify urgency 1. Vide email dated 26/10/2016 to Sh K A Talwar Dy Registrar/CIC was requested to update online status of File no. CIC/SS/A/2014/900349. The latest online status is available at Page 2-6 of supporting document. 2. In the description of Document 1 under heading Supporting Documents, date of RTI application i.e. 28/10/2013 was specified. Initial objection of IC Sh M A Khan Yusufi was that date of RTI application was not specified in the second appeal. Accordingly, printout of online status of RTI application was provided as desired by IC. 3. IC requested to provide copy of email dated 14/03/2013 as mentioned in RTI application. The records of representative of respondents (PIO who is supposed to represent CAG was not available during hearing. It is not known in what capacity and identity, representatives of respondents were present) were incomplete. Accordingly, printout of email was provided to IC. Sh S P Beck Joint Secretary/CIC is connected with the case during his posting as Director/Vigilance/S&T/Railway Board. In this regard, CVC Complaint 32844/2016 dated 27/04/2016 is under process with CVC. 4. It was further submitted to IC that cybercrime is being observed in CIC registry since Year 2015 when Sh Vijai Sharma was CIC. In this regard, CVC Complaint 23765/2015 is under process with CVC. 5. It was further submitted original RTI application was submitted online to DoPT who transferred the application online to Department of Expenditure who transferred it in paper form to PIO/CAG without first four pages of email attached with RTI application. Without checking his official email, PIO/CAG stated in ambivalent manner that email has not been received. The same malafide response was upheld by FAA/CAG. 6. Point No. 5 to 15 is available at Page 6 to 17 of supporting document.
539 Shams Tabrez CICOM/R/2016/80004
Please open supporting PDF document.
540 Prashanth Kumar Pandey CICOM/R/2016/80009
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Room No.306, 2nd Floor, B-Wing, August Kranti Bhawan Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110066. The matter relates to the second appeal order dated 04.08.2014 of file no.CIC/LS/A/2013/001333/RM. In connection to the order by Honble CIC and its implementation, in connection I have already filed two Non-Compliance letters to the office and now I am requesting the status update of both the letters 1 Please give the updated status & action taken on my Non-Compliance letter dated 20.11.2014 sent by speed post on 20.11.2014 by consignment no ERN033002344IN. Attachment page 2 2 Please give the latest updated status and action taken on my Non-Compliance letter dated 20.08.2016 given by hand in the DAK section of CIC office. Attachment page 2 3 Please provide the updated status of Dairy No.185468 dated 27.11.2014 4 Please provide the updated status of Dairy No. 155190 dated 20.08.2015 5 I Request PIO to please provide the expected date of re-hearing the matter for deciding and disposing the matter. 6 Has the officials of CIC sent any kind of notice or intimation to the authorities of IAF regarding this matter 7 By when the matter will be decided from the end of CIC 8 What is the prescribed time limit as per the act for disposal of such matters. 9 Request to provide certified copy of the periodic progress report with action taken for redressing grievances by the departments for appropriate action. 10 Request to inform the reasons forwarded by concerned departments to justify abnormal delay in disposal of the matter or forwarding it to higher authority. 11 Request to inform the present status of my complaints, giving the names of officer of concerned departments who have kept the matter pending without decision/ action. 12 Request to provide certified copies of forwarding notes under which my representation was sent by respective department. 13 What action should be taken against the officials who do not do the public works relating to the matter. 14 What action has been taken on my letter/representation/complaint. Invite independent reports from all concerned offices. 15 List the date of first action initiated on my complaint by every concerned office separately. 16 Please supply the copy of all action taken by every office separately. 17 The name of officer & designation who has to presently act on my complaint in every office separately. 18 Any other typed/printed out/hand written page or sheet/register if CPIO likes to supply as information under RTI Act, relating to the matter.
541 Rahul Agrawal CICOM/R/2016/80011
Respected Sir/Madam, Please provide the copy of all RTI query in which MEA/CPV( consular and passport division of ministry of external affairs) was respondent in the second appeal to central information commission, from 1 January 2007 to till date Please provide the name , current designation and complete office address of officials of MEA/CPV who attended the applicant second appeal,if any of the officials retired their last office address. Please provide the detail of any penalty imposed by CIC on MEA/CPV please provide copy of such order from 1 January 2007 to till date If the information is available on CPV website please provide detail date on which it was loaded on CPV website, the complete URL or link to the page or file The official who uploaded the above data or file and name and designation and office address of the CPV official who authorized it to be uploaded on CPV website. The objective is to identify where people find difficulty in getting information from ( consular and passport division of ministry of external affairs) We can take those suggestion to PMO and other forums, and full the dream of Mr Modi to make India top 50 countries in doing ease of business.
Not Available
542 Manmohan Singh CICOM/R/2016/90001/1
Point No.4 pertains to Central Information Commission
543 Dr Rajinder Kumar Sharma CICOM/R/2016/00583
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
544 Manoj Kumar Mishra CICOM/R/2016/00622
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
545 Heera Lal CICOM/R/2016/00685
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
546 Prakashchand Chhaganmalji Jain CICOM/R/2016/00686
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
547 Shri Gopal Soni CICOM/R/2016/50222
as per attachment
As intimated by PS to Secy(CIC) the email received by Secy(CIC). The said mail was forwarded to IC(MP). PS to IC(MP)has intimated that the mail has been seen by IC(MP). No other action has been taken on this.
548 Nitin Bansal CICOM/R/2016/50254
Respected Sir, Earlier i sent two complained to the Central information commissioner dated 16-04-2016 with Registry No. RU333235885IN & RU333235894IN. Sir, i need some information on above mentioned complained on some points :- 1. Information regarding the action taken on these complained. Kindly provide the information under RTI act 2005. Thank you.
Not Available
One of your petitions which was against RBI has been registered as CIC/MP/C/2016/000145 and is pending in the registry of IC(MP) for disposal
549 Amit Kr CICOM/R/2016/50261
Respected CPIO, Please provide me the following information ASAP by speedy way . 1. I have filed certain Second Appeals and Complaints with following particulars , but I have not received any acknowledgement from CIC regarding Hearing till date. Please allow me what is the latest status of my file/form and hearing date. If no hearing date is decided, what is the expected date as per the experience of CIC in this matter. a. Second Appeal File No. CIC/BS/A/2016/000192 OR Appeal No. SA/UG/16/f2491gn01 b. Direct Complaint File No. CIC/BS/C/2016/000170 OR Complaint No. RC/UG/16/f5387a5ae c. Second Appeal File No. CIC/SA/A/2016/000551 OR Appeal No. SA/UG/16/f5882znpg 2. I received a letter from CIC regarding my Central Registry which is registered in CIC with No. 123873/28-03-2016/CIC/BS/C/2016/000170. In this regard, I have no idea when I filed this appeal/application/complaint. Please provide me the copy of appeal / application / complaint filed by me regarding this Registry and also allow me to know the latest status. Please also indicated the name of parties involved in this.
Not Available
550 Rohit Sharma CICOM/R/2016/80039
Please give the details of following questions: 1) How many individual Indian citizen have filed RTI request, from 1st January 2015 to 31st Dec 2015. Please give data in number only. 2) How many RTI requests have been filed from 1st january 2015 to 31st january 2015. Please give data in number only. 3) We generally asks questions in RTI requests and questions ends with special character . question mark. Why is the special character question mark is not allowed in text for RTI request application. (The image of question mark special character is attached) 4) As question mark symbol is not allowed in tet for RTI Request, does it mean that the website rtionline.gov.in do not want the citizen to ask questions.
1. This information is not available. 2. Kindly download Annual Report 2014-15 from CIC website at CIC.gov.in. Information is available for complete year.
551 R K Jain CICOM/R/2016/00404/1
Point no. B, C, D, E are concerned to you. It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
(B), (C) & (D). The requested information is not maintained in JS(M&R) section. (E). The requested information is available on official website of Central Information Commission. (www.cic.gov.in)
552 Rama Krishna CICOM/R/2016/00501
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
553 P J Prasad CICOM/R/2016/00577
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
554 Bishweshwar Paswan CICOM/R/2016/00584/1
Point no.B,C,D,1,2 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
555 S P Singh Shishodia CICOM/R/2016/00600
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
556 Venkatesh Nayak CICOM/R/2016/00612
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
557 Vijay Pal Singh CICOM/R/2016/00627/1
Point no.1,2 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
558 Gurmit Singh Saini CICOM/R/2016/00635
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
559 P P Kapoor CICOM/R/2016/00678
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
560 Prince Singhal CICOM/R/2016/00681
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
561 Priti Gupta CICOM/R/2016/00683
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
562 Prakash Shukla CICOM/R/2016/00690
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
563 Sunil Kumar Sabui CICOM/R/2016/00693
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
564 Sandeep Kumar CICOM/R/2016/00694
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
565 Rajiv Kumar CICOM/R/2016/00698/2
Point no.1 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record
566 Rajiv Kumar CICOM/R/2016/00698/3
Point no.3 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record
567 Satyanarayan Verma CICOM/R/2016/00708
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
568 Khoda Sanjoy CICOM/R/2016/00717
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
569 Partha Pratim Bera CICOM/R/2016/00744/1
Point no.1,2,9 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
570 Bighnaraj Meher CICOM/R/2016/00799
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
571 PRAVEEN KANT CICOM/R/2016/50221
PROIVIDE THE CERTIFIED COPIES OF ALL THE ENCLOSURES (ALL PAGES , 47 PAGES) INCLUDING THE COMPLAINT/REVISION MADE TO THE COMMISSION BY THE APPLICANT (PRAVEN KANT) . ENCLOSED AND SEND TO THE COMMISSION WITH THE COMPLAINT/REVISION. VIDE NO. PK/CIC/2015/REPLY/01 DATED: 01/06/2015 DELIVERED THROUGH REGISTERED SPEED POST NO. EC916824512 I N DATED: 02/06/2015.
572 KR SINGH A CICOM/R/2016/50231
To, Nodal CPIO, Central Information Commission (CIC) August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi. Subject: - Seeking Information under RTI Act, 2005. Sir/Madam, Under Right to Information Act, 2005 I am seeking following information. 1. Related to AMC of Computers in CIC. a. Name of the Vender (company) providing present Annual Maintenance Contract (AMC) for Computer and for how many Computers. b. Period of present AMC (starting date and end date). c. Number of Manpower provided by vendor for maintenance of Computers. d. Initial date since when present vendor is providing AMC, if the same vendor was provided AMC earlier and for how may years the same vender is proving AMC in CIC. e. Annual AMC Charge paid to present vendor for the current AMC period. f. Comparative Statement (prepared before awarding contract) of AMC of Computers for the last 04 years. 2. One side CIC is crying for shortage of manpower and another side some staff of the Commission are enjoying undue benefits like regularly late coming, may be, due to some personal interest of officer(s). Right now I come to know only about one punctual late comer. a. Might be, because of her punctual late coming habit and/or some other reason(s), she has been thrown out from her pervious section. Provide Bio-metric Attendance Sheet of Anita Ojha, DEO showing in-time and out-time for the Months August-2015 to May-2016 and for how many days salary has been paid and amount, month-wise. Name of the Section where she has been posted now and name of the Officer. Details of works allotted to her. b. Details of allocation of work among the staff of Administration Section of CIC and number of total staff., Name of Staff, Designation, Type of staff (Regular/ Outsource /Contract),Details of works allotted. 3. Provide copy of the Comparative Statement of AMC of Air-Conditioners and Taxi. NOTE: Please reply me online only (save paper, money and time), donot send physical copy. If, scanned document size is too large to upload online, send such document in email to my email id - aks.rtiindia@gmail.com
573 Dr G V Rao CICOM/R/2016/50239
WHAT IS THE ACTION TAKEN ON MY COMPLAINT BEARING NO. GVR/RES/RTI/2016/004 DATED 05.01.2016. BY WHAT TIME WILL I GET THE CERTIFIED COPIES OF THE WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS MADE BY THE TWO RESPONDENTS IN CIC/SS/A/2013/002-480-YA, AS ORDERED BY MS.ACHLA SINHA, ADDL.SECR-CUM-FAA. FURTHER WHAT ACTION WAS TAKEN AGAINST THE CPIO, MR. HARIT FOR NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE ORDERS OF THE FAA IN MY RTI FIRST APPEAL BEARING NO. CICOM/A/2015/60055 DATED 28.04.2015.
Not Available
574 USHA DEVI CICOM/R/2016/50251/1
SEVA ME, CPIO, CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION, NEW DELHI - : 110066 MERE SECOND APPEAL NO. CIC / VS / A 2012/000537 ME HEARING KAB TAK HOGI. KRIPYA BATANE KI KRIPA KI JAYE. AAPKA VISWASI USHA DEVI The concerned case file is related with Madhya Bihar Gramin Bank. Subject matter concerned to registry of IC(SH). Also the file has never been received in this registry.
Not Available
575 DHANIKAIVELU N CICOM/R/2016/50258
To The CPIO CIC New Delhi Subject: Information sought under RTI Act 2005 Sir I need the following information from concerned Department for Last Five years (2010-2016) 1)The Copies of RTI Annual return filed by under mentioned Public Authorities 2)The Copies of second appeal filed against under mentioned Public Authorities Name of the Public Authorities: i)Ministry of Micro small and Medium Enterprises ii) Office of the Development Commissioner(MSME) iii)MSME_DI, Hyderabad iv)MSME_DI, Chennai v)MSME_DI, Ahmedabad vi) MSME_DI, Hubli vii) Office of the Chief Controller of Accounts, Ministry of industry Thank You Regards Dhanikaivelu N
Not Available
(1) The requested information is is available in annual reports of Commission. Annual reports from 2005-06 to 2014-15 are available on the official site of Central Information Commission. (www.cic.gov.in) (2) Information related to total number of cases registered is available on the official site of Central Information Commission (www.cic.gov.in). However, copies of 2nd Appeal filed against any particular public authority cannot be given.
576 DHANIKAIVELU N CICOM/R/2016/50262
To The CPIO CIC New Delhi Subject: Information sought under RTI Act 2005 Sir I need the following information from concerned Department for Last Five years (2010-2016) 1)The Copies of RTI Annual return filed by under mentioned Public Authorities 2)The Copies of second appeal filed against under mentioned Public Authorities Name of the Public Authorities: i)Ministry of Micro small and Medium Enterprises ii) Office of the Development Commissioner(MSME) iii)MSME_DI, Hyderabad iv)MSME_DI, Chennai v)MSME_DI, Ahmedabad vi) MSME_DI, Hubli vii) Office of the Chief Controller of Accounts, Ministry of industry // Please provide the reply with attestation, Index and page numbers. Thanking You Regards Dhanikaivelu N
Not Available
(1) The requested information is is available in annual reports of Commission. Annual reports from 2005-06 to 2014-15 are available on the official site of Central Information Commission. (www.cic.gov.in) (2) Information related to total number of cases registered is available on the official site of Central Information Commission (www.cic.gov.in). However, copies of 2nd Appeal filed against any particular public authority cannot be given
577 Raju Prasad CICOM/R/2016/50279
Respected Sir Kindly arrange to provide Annual & Quarterly report with all annexures for the year 2015-16 i.e (01.04.2015 to 31.03.2016) filed by DAMODAR VALLEY CORPORATION Public authority with you . The information may please be provided on my above mentioned address by speed post. Regards Raju Prasad
Not Available
578 R K Jain CICOM/R/2016/00523/1
point no.C is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
579 Radheyshyam Gupt CICOM/R/2016/00752
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
580 Tanvir Ahmed Siddiqui CICOM/R/2016/00765/2
Point no.5 is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
581 K S Jain CICOM/R/2016/00767
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
582 Dr Puspalata Rout CICOM/R/2016/00769
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
583 R P Kalra CICOM/R/2016/00775
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
584 Dr Amrit Mehta CICOM/R/2016/00778
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
585 P Gopala Shastry CICOM/R/2016/00779
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
586 Vidhyadhar Pandey CICOM/R/2016/00781
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
587 Rajni Devi CICOM/R/2016/00807
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
588 Jatinder Kumar CICOM/R/2016/00808
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
589 Anil Sood CICOM/R/2016/00813
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
590 Rajni Devi CICOM/R/2016/00816
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
591 K S Jain CICOM/R/2016/00827
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
592 M D Jabeer CICOM/R/2016/00833
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
593 Vijay Prakash Gupta CICOM/R/2016/00837
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
594 Ganga Prasad Pachauri CICOM/R/2016/00838
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
595 R P Rohilla CICOM/R/2016/00839
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
596 D M Akolkar CICOM/R/2016/00846
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
597 Gaya Singh CICOM/R/2016/00855
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
598 Dr Anil Jain CICOM/R/2016/00867
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
599 T Narsimha Murthy CICOM/R/2016/00869
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
600 R K Mahajan CICOM/R/2016/00896
It is concerned to you. Reply to be send directly to the Appellant and the scanned copy of the same may be placed in this file for record.
601 VULLAGANTI VENKATA KRISHNA KUMAR CICOM/R/2016/50283
I am V Venkata Krishna Kumar s/o V.V.N.Rao Identified by Income Tax PAN Number AEBPV8567N Govt. and Voter Card ID TDZ1006338 issued by ERO 60, Khairatabad having permanent address H.No 26-31-4/a/1, 5th line, A.T Agraharam, Guntur -522004 and currently residing at H.No 6-3-612/9, Ground Floor, AnandNagar colony, Khairatabad, Hyderabad - 500004 Seeking below information from CPIO as per Act and requesting you kindly must provide information reply in scanned copy duly attested by CPIO as per Act. REF Seeking below information related to File Number: CIC/SH/A/2015/000797 and Second Appeal Number SA/UG/15/f6481rs2f and Date of Receipt of Hard copy 2015-03-16. 1) Provide RTI applicant details like address, fathers name etc. 2) Provide Signed copy of Appeal received to Central Information commission vide File Number: CIC/SH/A/2015/000797 and Second Appeal Number SA/UG/15/f6481rs2f. Kindly provide scanned copy duly attested by CPIO as per Act. Please see the attached document for more details. 3) What is the current status of appeal as on end of May 2016. 4) Kindly provide the original RTI filed date. vide File Number: CIC/SH/A/2015/000797 and Second Appeal Number SA/UG/15/f6481rs2f. Kindly provide scanned copy duly attested by CPIO or concerned. 5) Provide the first appeal filed date vide File Number: CIC/SH/A/2015/000797 and Second Appeal Number SA/UG/15/f6481rs2f. 6) Is there any preference given for filing, adjournments, hearings etc. vide File Number: CIC/SH/A/2015/000797 and Second Appeal Number SA/UG/15/f6481rs2f. Kindly Provide the reasons for priority if any. 7) What kind of action will be taken by Central Information commission if the said complaint or appeal is fraudulent Fraudulent means in current scenario like Signature in signed copy is not from correct person, manipulation of application trying to mislead public authorities to get judicial claims or attempted to get claims etc. a) What kind of action will be taken if material witness or evidences given to the knowledge of Central Information commission. b) what kind of directions will be passed accordingly for the protection of highness of commission. if the above 2 points a, b are belonging to section 4 (1)(b) of act. Kindly provide info. free of cost. Kindly provide reply information question wise as per act including sub points. Kind Note: There are multiple instances of tampered and defective postal articles are getting received to my address from Khairatabad Delivery PO which are already recorded as various cases including Central Vigilance commission, hence requesting you kindly provide the scanned copy of pdf attached to the online RTI reply and another scanned copy to my registered email address krishnakumar.v@hotmail.com and may send a hard copy to my communication address. Please find the attached documents with this RTI application which were taken from CIC website.
602 bhawani sankar nanda CICOM/R/2016/50284
AS PER ATTACHED FILE
603 SABEEL AHMED K CICOM/R/2016/50287
what is the status of the case of Mr. ALIYAR IMTHIYAZ AHMED file no: CIC/VS/A/2014/003564 was the hearing held on 05/05/2016 what is the decision taken during the hearing held on 05/05/2016
Not Available
604 Sajan Kumar Jain CICOM/R/2016/50295
Please provide the signed and stamped copy of all correspondence & file notings made till date in the Direct Complaint Number RC/UG/14/f2065299r.
Not Available
605 Dr. Vidyanand Thakur CICOM/R/2016/50313
Please furnish following two information, 1. Please furnish the Diary number with its date of representation dated 14.05.2016 addressed to IC, CIC, Shri M A Khan Yusufi and which has been shown to be received there in R&I section of this department on 25.05.2016 vide speed post registration No. EI209552899IN as per enclosed supportive document. 2. Please furnish a copy of action taken against said representation dated 14.05.2016 (& received there on 25.05.2016) addressed to IC, CIC, Shri M A Khan Yusufi regarding denial of furnishing the complete & categorical information by the Respondent, CPIO, DPE against order No. CIC/KY /A/2016/900269 dated 18.04.2016 w.r.t. self-explanatory view regarding DPEs O.M. dated 1.6.2011 and which has been Falsely rather deliberately said so dated 27.11.2015.
606 R K Mishra CICOM/R/2016/50314
To The CPIO under RTI Act 2005. Central Information Commission, B 2nd Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan Bhikaji Cama Place New Delhi-110066 Dear Sir, The following request for information refers to non-compliance of CIC order dated 29-01-2016, F.No.CIC/RM/A/2014/001091-YA 1. Whether copies of the above mentioned CIC Order has been dispatched to the concerned CPIO & Appellate Authority of the Public Authority. 2. If so, details of the speed post tracking numbers and date of dispatch as available with CIC. 3. Whether the Respondent has intimated the commission(as directed by Hon-ble Commissioner) about compliance of the Order. 4. If not, details of action taken by the commission for non-compliance of its Order. Yours truly (R K Mishra)
Not Available
607 Sajan Kumar Jain CICOM/R/2016/50323
Please provide me the signed & stamped copy of case file No. CIC/VS/C/2014/000046 (RTI application, Notice, Letters, File notings, Correspondene, E-mail, everything available & relating to this case.)
Not Available
608 SK GULAM JAWEED CICOM/R/2016/50330
Please provide the following information under RTI Act 2005 1. The present status of CIC/YA/A/2016/900323 09-01-2016 SA/UG/16/896zt57 2. The procedure follows in posting of case 3. The reason for delay in posting of the present cases though the cases register in the month of June2016 have been posted for hearing. 4. If the delay occur in CIC, then to whom we shall approach. 5. Is it mandatory to appear before CIC for hearing or we can send the relevant documents for hearing. 6. Can CIC arrange video conferencing for the person where he resides presently other than the place where he resides at the time of application
Not Available